Â鶹ԼÅÄ

Competitive tendering

Please note: details about the Competitive Tendering Process for Commissioning Television Programmes and Content will be available on the .

In order to achieve value for money we use a range of methods to procure goods and services. The choice of method depends on the type of product or service and its overall value. Competitive tendering is our overall preferred course of action for supplier selection and is generally utilised in the Â鶹ԼÅÄ when the value of the goods and services to be purchased exceeds £50,000. The following documents are usually used:

• Instructions to tenderer detailing administrative procedures relating to the tender e.g. dates and times, method of tender return, evaluation criteria and where tender queries should be directed
• Invitation to tender

The invitation to tender includes:

• Specification of requirement
• Service level agreement
• Commercial, operational, corporate social responsibility
• Pricing schedule

EU tendering

Where the overall value is likely to exceed certain financial thresholds, the Â鶹ԼÅÄ is required to follow procedures laid down in the .

The following financial thresholds came into force with effect from 1st January 2024:

• Supply and services contracts (sub-central government): Â£214,904
• Works contracts (central and sub-central):&²Ô²ú²õ±è;£5,372,609
• Light touch regime services: £663,540
• Concessions:&²Ô²ú²õ±è;£5,372,609

Open procedure

The open procedure is a one-stage bidding process, where all interested suppliers responding to a notice in  will be invited to submit a tender. The notice states where interested parties obtain tender documents and the last date when tenders will be accepted. The open procedure is not commonly used by the Â鶹ԼÅÄ.

Restricted procedure

This is a two-stage bidding process in which potential suppliers responding to a notice in FTS are subject to a pre-qualification stage. A shortlist is then drawn up and the shortlisted suppliers are invited to submit tenders. The restricted procedure is most likely to be applied where large numbers of applicants are anticipated.

Competitive dialogue procedure

A procedure to be used for complex contracts where the open or restricted procedure would be inappropriate. Potential suppliers responding to a notice in FTS are subject to a pre-qualification stage. A shortlist is then drawn up and the shortlisted suppliers are invited to participate in a competitive dialogue.

The competitive dialogue procedure allows the Â鶹ԼÅÄ to discuss potential solutions with the suppliers; there may be further shortlisting during this procedure where planned. When the dialogues are completed the suppliers are invited to submit final tenders. Following submission of the final tenders no further negotiation with the contractors can take place.

Competitive procedure with negotiation

This is a procurement procedure for complex requirements (i.e. not ‘off the shelf’) under which contracting authorities may award a contract following evaluation of the bidders' initial tenders. However, they may also conduct the procedure in successive stages and carry out negotiations on the initial and any subsequent tenders.

Light touch regime

In the case of services, the exact procedure to be followed depends on the nature of the services. The former Part A/Part B distinction has now gone, and the vast majority of services fall into the mainstream rules (as per the former Part A). A few specific services (including cultural services) are subject to a 'light touch regime', and may be procured with less formality.

Pre-qualification

Potential suppliers must demonstrate their financial standing and technical ability to meet the Â鶹ԼÅÄ's requirements. The Â鶹ԼÅÄ will also take account of potential suppliers' past performance and experience with reference to contracts of a similar nature, both with the Â鶹ԼÅÄ and other organisations.

The Â鶹ԼÅÄ may also look for a clear demonstration of commitment to equal opportunities in employment, to the environment and to health and safety (where relevant to the subject of the particular contract).

The Â鶹ԼÅÄ may ask for references from previous customers, bankers and business information companies and, in some cases, arrange inspection visits to the company and/or its work sites.

Evaluation of tenders

In order to preserve the integrity of the competitive process, it is imperative that the evaluation of proposals is undertaken objectively, consistently and without bias towards particular suppliers.

Tenders will be evaluated against a pre-determined set of criteria. It is very unlikely that contracts are awarded on the basis of price alone. The Â鶹ԼÅÄ usually awards a contract to the supplier(s) it considers offers the best value for money. For this reason, the main evaluation criterion will usually be the "most economically advantageous tender" as determined by the award criteria and sub-criteria set out in the tender documents.

The award criteria vary depending on the type of contract. Examples of award criteria, in addition to price, are technical merit, flexibility to future changes to requirements, speed of project delivery, sustainability and quality.

Award of contract

An evaluation team will examine each tender received and make recommendations as to which tender is the most economically advantageous. Once the decision to award the contract has been made, both the successful and unsuccessful tenderers will be notified.

Unsuccessful tenderers will receive a detailed letter explaining the reasons for the Â鶹ԼÅÄ's decision and the relative characteristics of their bid compared to the winning bid. These letters will also specify a standstill period of between 10 and 15 days. The Â鶹ԼÅÄ will not sign the contract until the standstill period has expired.

A contract award notice will be placed in FTS (if applicable) within 48 days of the contract being awarded.