Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

World Cup 2006 Blog

From our reporters in Germany

Apologies

LONDON - Apologies for problems we had on the blog last night.
Our seemingly inoffensive post regarding Trinidad & Tobago shirts kicked off a somewhat foul-mouthed Scottish/English verbal war and we consequently turned off comments on that post.

Apologies to anyone who found some of the comments offensive and apologies to those (many) of you who had genuine things to say which got deleted in the crossfire.

The blog is currently "reactively moderated". Which means a comment appears automatically unless someone complains about it, in which case it will be removed if the complaint is upheld.

We would like to carry on relying on readers to complain before we take action as comments appear quicker and it's a more open form of communication after all. But it maybe that is not possible. We will monitor the situation. Thoughts?

Comments  Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 02:43 PM on 01 Jun 2006,
  • wrote:

It should be quite easy to filter out any really offensive words.

Without seeing what was said, I can't comment in detail, but I think you need to encourage, not discourage, vigorous debate and discussion, to provide a vibrant interactive experience for everyone.

I've no experience of vast numbers of comments(!), but I think if you moderate comments, then you'll just head towards a sterile, boring environment, which isn't a good thing.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 2.
  • At 05:19 PM on 01 Jun 2006,
  • wrote:

Ian - in a way your are right, be reading over 80 comments about English/Scottish rivalry in such a manner was neither vigorous debate or a vibrant interactive experience.

I tend to think blogs get quite dull when the comments section starts to be used like a forum, it sort of ruins it for me, like I can't be bothered to read through 80-odd comments.

The Guardian now has a registration system in order to comment, this has meant many people who contribute positively now don't. It's a difficult one to work.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 3.
  • At 05:45 PM on 01 Jun 2006,
  • Jack wrote:

I thought external advertising wasn't allowed on the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ but you appear to have kept some on the original post?

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 4.
  • At 06:57 PM on 01 Jun 2006,
  • Claire S wrote:

Hi,
1. Registration. The software we're using does not require registration to comment and it's a route we don't necessarily want to go down as it discourages people from joining in. It doesn't have a swear filter either..

2. Advertising. We don't carry advertising but I think in a debate about 'where to get T&T shirts' it is editorially acceptable to discuss 'where to get said shirts'!
It's just a shame that lots of the comments from people suggesting other outlets (which mitigates the affect of featuring just one outlet) did not appear due to the abuse.

3. Moderation - yup we want to encourage as vibrant a debate as possible and that means being as open as possible. This isn't a messageboard or a forum and I agree long 'yes it is, oh no it isn't' rallies are boring but it's a tricky balancing act as we're finding!
Claire S - blog editor

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 5.
  • At 07:23 PM on 01 Jun 2006,
  • Andreas wrote:

Those mud fights destroy a serious debate all too easily. It seems to me the great majority here a reasonable people. So maybe it helps if we react to offensive posts more like "If you can't get your point across without insulting people we'll ignore it." You'll have my respect. But maybe thats just a nice dream ...

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 
  • 6.
  • At 05:52 AM on 02 Jun 2006,
  • Pete M wrote:

Without reactivating the debate, the news that Scots don't support England in the World Cup is hardly news and most Scots feel like they're being press-ganged into supporting their ancient footballing rival. There were some good points made in the comments section amongst all the trashtalk from both sides that gave the Scottish viewpoint with humour and intelligence. You knew what you were doing when you posted that. ;) Controversy is the best thing for blog traffic. Anyhow, I look forward to asking England fans if they'll be suporting Germany later in the tournament. And Spurs fans if they supported Arsenal in Europe.

Complain about this post

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Required
Required (not displayed)
 

Post a comment

Please note name and email are required.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Required
Required (not displayed)
  Your email address will only be held by the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ and will be used for the purpose of administering this blog site. The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ may also contact you to further inquire about issues raised in mails posted to the blog. If you would like further information, please read the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ's privacy policy
    

The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ.co.uk