ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ BLOGS - Peston's Picks
Β« Previous | Main | Next Β»

Browne’s tragic lie

Robert Peston | 17:45 UK time, Tuesday, 1 May 2007

Only two years ago, Lord Browne was the most feted chief executive of any British company.

Now he has had to his 41 year career at BP.

browne.jpgAnd the main reason for his resignation appears to be his embarrassment that he lied to the courts when attempting to obtain an injunction to prevent publication by the of an interview with his former boyfriend, Jeff Chevalier.

Lord Browne told the court that he had met Mr Chevalier in Battersea Park in London.

In fact they had met on a male escort website.

The judge also pointed out that Lord Browne had attempted to β€œtrash” Mr Chevalier's credibility by painting him as a liar, unstable, and adversely affected by dependence on alcohol and illegal drugs – but then could not furnish evidence, other than the claim of his butler that his wine stocks were diminishing.

The painful irony for Lord Browne is that BP has investigated Mr Chevalier's claim that he misused company resources and property and has dismissed them.

So Lord Browne has been hoist on the petard of how he tried to block Mr Chevalier's interview – though not by the substance of what Mr Chevalier claimed in that interview.

It's a personal tragedy for Lord Browne – and one that will have financial ramifications for him.

He is surrendering up to Β£15m in remuneration due to his decision to quit the company he loves.

°δ΄Η³Ύ³Ύ±π²Τ³Ω²υΜύΜύ Post your comment

  • 1.
  • At 06:24 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • David wrote:

I don't give a damn about Lord Browne's sexuality but as a BP shareholder I consider a 12m pension obscene.

  • 2.
  • At 06:24 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • David W wrote:

It is very sad. Business is probably still a difficult world in which to be 'out', and Browne may rightly have regarded it as nobody's business but his own. As it used to be said of government, the risk is probably not in being gay, but being prone to extortion or willing to obfuscate in order to conceal that fact.

Β£15m is a lot of money, but Lord B was paid about Β£3m last year in salary and bonuses, notwithstanding share awards. He's got enough to keep the discrete butler!

  • 3.
  • At 06:35 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Steve wrote:

Yesterday, ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔi ran a story about the putative end of the battle for gay equality.

Today, you are reporting on the Daily Mail's prurient interest in the fact that some people in public life are gay. Lord Browne is not a hypopcrite, he is not behaving immorally or dishonestly, and he has never sought to publicise his personal life.

What a difference a day makes. The sooner the contemptible Daily Mail ends its pathetic war on gay people, the better.

  • 4.
  • At 07:10 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • David Hosten wrote:

Its shameful, that in this day and age, we as a society can't be more accepting. I applaud him for the fine work he has done for BP and BP's shareholders thus far.
What a shame that it should come to this.

  • 5.
  • At 07:13 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Nick Hoskinson wrote:

Whilst not gay myself, I really think the press is the most diabolical method of presenting the truth of anything about anybody.
I wonder just how many of the reporters on any of the so called "NEWS" papers are hiding the fact that they are gay. Would they own up, or as it is known "Come Out" if questioned. Or would they slither back under their stones. How about some relief from the "Zealots Of The PRESS" Let him who thinks he has nothing to hide stand up and be examined.

  • 6.
  • At 07:35 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Frank Cowell wrote:

A *tragic" lie? No. Just a lie, surely?

  • 7.
  • At 07:54 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Saif wrote:

What an ugly phrase 'hoist on the petard of how he tried...'. It detracts from whatever you are trying to say.

  • 8.
  • At 07:56 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Steve Jones wrote:

There are positive sides to this. He has
shown he is only human, and now it will
be just that little bit harder for other fat cats
to claim they are worth giant wages, when
in fact they are merely flesh and blood like
the rest of us.

  • 9.
  • At 08:27 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Philip Lloyd wrote:

Lord Browne is and was one of the best leaders of any British or international companies. The care and diligence with which he raised BP from potential ashes and turned it into the global powerhouse that it is today is recognised within the company, in the wider business and indeed political world. It was known for years that he was Gay, and those who value professionalism and performance never talked abouit this, I assume because it was irrelevant to his accomplishments and the undoubted high regard with which any intelligent person holds such a successful and human man.

  • 10.
  • At 08:49 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • sean wrote:

I think it's a shame that he found it neccesary to lie in court and loose his job. If the story was about business rather than his personal life as the daily mail's editor suggests, then why is where Lord Browne met his lover a relevant part of the story?

Another odious campiagn of associated press against gay people dressed up as something else. Everyone who works at this pathetic so-called newspaper should be ashamed of themselves.

  • 11.
  • At 08:59 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Paul Johnson wrote:

Philip Lloyd, lets not let the spectacles be too rose tinted. He built a company with a poor safety culture. That is far from acceptable in this day and age.

  • 12.
  • At 09:05 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • d davies wrote:

Is anyone else finding Browns's loss of 15 million quid & the loss of 15 lives at bp's refinery in Texas strangely symetrical?

karmagedden

  • 13.
  • At 09:12 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Dylan wrote:

Any example of tabloid obsession with the private lives of the rich and famous..Where was the Daily Mail when BP had an explosion in Texas in 2005? there was no front page headlines then! Its appaling the way the media tries to make profit out of the private misfortunes of others.

  • 14.
  • At 09:17 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Steve Collins wrote:

I'm not sure Battersea Park is any better than an escort website, given certain parts of Battersea Park are - ahem - shall we say similar to Clapham Common or Hampstead Heath.

  • 15.
  • At 09:27 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Mark wrote:

Homosexuality OK... Lying under Oath in the Queen's Court..... Strip his Title.

  • 16.
  • At 09:36 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Frank wrote:

"So Lord Browne has been hoist on the petard of how he tried to block Mr Chevalier's interview"

The phrase is "hoist with one's own petard" - a petard is a small bomb. Even if the usage were correct, it's still a singularly inelegant sentence :)

  • 17.
  • At 09:36 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • James Tipping wrote:

Would Lord Browne have lied so readily if he had expected fair treatment by the Daily Mail? I doubt it, he expected his sexuality to come to the fore, over and above allegations over his business conduct.
Otherwise, wouldn't the Mail have spent the time and money investigating what turned out to be baseless claims at BP, rather than outing him.
BP shareholders can't really quibble at the pension, I'm guessing that by any reasonable performance indicators, he has done well for his shareholders, you only have to look at Vodafone to see the opposite

  • 18.
  • At 09:55 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • NigeC wrote:

Why does the ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ consider his lie to be 'Tragic'?

The man lied to a court of law, surely that is perjury??

Why isn't the police involved, why is the judge defending his actions??

Nige

  • 19.
  • At 10:05 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Duncan Linning-Karp wrote:

This simply goes to show that in certain spheres of life being gay and β€˜out’ is sadly still not acceptable. If it were then The Mail would not have decided to publish this and Lord Browne would not have been foolishly tempted to lie under oath about it. There is still a long way to go in the struggle for equality. Frankly, one of the saddest facts is that supposedly reputable news organisations like the ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ feel the need to publish this trash.

  • 20.
  • At 10:07 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Chris wrote:

What an amazing series of events - its almost Shakespearean. Power, personalities, sexual intrigue, trust, truth, lies, honour, money! Who will play the leading role in the film?

  • 21.
  • At 10:14 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Tibbs wrote:

Lord Browne hasn't lost his job because of his sexuality. He's lost his job because of an integrity issue - he lied under oath in a court of law. Will his title spare and protect him from due process or will we see him being prosecuted for perjury and tried like a lesser mortal?

  • 22.
  • At 10:24 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Eric wrote:

It's none of my business whether Lord Browne (or any other figure not using his position to attack gays) is gay or straight, where he meets adult partners, or what he gets up to with them thereafter.
And it should be no concern of the press or of the ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ.

Lying under oath is indeed more serious; but in this case the punishment seems out of all proportion to the crime.

  • 23.
  • At 10:25 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Andrew Craig-Bennett wrote:

I'm neither gay nor rich, but I feel very sorry for Lord Browne. He has been blamed for a "poor safety culture in BP" when in fact the "poor safety culture" was in Amoco, a US corporation that BP took over and has been trying to bring into line with its own standards. And to be forced to resign by the "Mail on Sunday" because he was being blackmailed by a fellow whom that tabloid newspaper might have called a rent boy is a sad comment on our age. Some of us thought we had grown out of that sort of thing.

He is the outstanding business leader of the last decade, without whom those BP shareholders now decrying his pension might not have had a company to have shares in.

  • 24.
  • At 10:45 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Nigel Reese wrote:

The Mail on Sunday and it's sister rag the Mail had no real story of any merit. The claim was that it was of interest in the business community. I was not aware that anyone of merit in the business community reads such trashy titles as the "Mail". The real story was the kiss and tell from an unstable and vulnerable young man, who was given "living expenses" by the Mail in exchange for his story. No doubt they can justify their position by the inevitable increase in circulation that will now occur as the good old British public salivates freely whilst reading the juicy tittle tattle they will publish.

I feel very sorry for Lord Browne and his ex-lover. Both of whom have been exploited.

  • 25.
  • At 10:50 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Oliver wrote:

If I was the Daily Mail reporter, I'm not sure I could live with myself after this.
What a pathetic excuse for a story from a pathetic excuse for a rag. I'm not a fan of oil companies but I wouldn't wish this on anyone (except perhaps for the editor of the Daily Mail).

  • 26.
  • At 11:28 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • Paul wrote:

Browne presided over a decentralised company that cut costs ending in many deaths, 15, and many many injuries, 180, atthe Texas City refinery in 2005. Decentralisation is the get out clause for executives. None of them saw fit to resign. Why should they? 15 deaths is `an incident` or `an accident`.
The same Texas City plant has seen another death and many incidents, five in the last six weeks in fact, since then. Browne also risked it all in Russia and Hayward presided over delayed projects Thunder Horse and Atlantis. There are still court cases to come over Texas City and the record spill in Alaska and Gazprom is circling some of its Russian fields. Who would want to invest in this shambles Browne - who lied to a court and trashed his former boyfirend without any evidence - has left?

  • 27.
  • At 11:40 PM on 01 May 2007,
  • james wrote:

Judged by the behavior of the English press, and the comments posted here, one can only conclude the following:

Brits are still as homophobic as ever.

Brits are still class driven and pathetically jealous of anyone more successful than themselves.

"Old Europe" indeed

  • 28.
  • At 12:00 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Carl wrote:

Well as an employee of bp, I have to say I'm very sad to hear about this. Lord Browne was a true inspiration to all of the 100,000 employees that work at bp.

He really has been a true representation of good leadership through his decade or so in the top job, and he will be remembered for building one of the world's biggest companies.

Whilst his premature exit is a huge shock, I feel that this doesn't come down to a 'lie', or some 'media intrusion'; this comes down to a bitter ex-lover who was no longer getting his life paid for. For that to bring down one of this country's greatest leaders, is a great great shame.

Good luck Lord Browne. We here at bp will miss you.

  • 29.
  • At 12:04 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Joe wrote:

Comment 1 (david) is talking tosh. a 12m pension scheme is well worth it, if you consider the mess BP was in when Browne took over. What would david rather, that John Browne took less, but then consequently the company became a target rather than a predator!!!
As for John Brownes sexuality, he should have just been honest in court, it's no big deal being gay today.

  • 30.
  • At 01:42 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Richard wrote:

Through the CSB report and the Baker Report regarding the 15 fatalities at Texas City Refinery it has been more than proved that BP is operated with very little Engineering Integrity, it seems that the company is totally focussed on money at all costs. The revelations of yesterday regarding Browne demonstrate his complete lack of integrity and cavalier attitude to British Law…. May be there is some connection here. I find it very sad that her resigned now, when he should have resigned after the death of the 15 contractors at Texas City, or at least once the Baker Report was published…. Why have the journalist pursued the β€œGay Story” whilst completely ignoring the corporate incompetence story?

  • 31.
  • At 03:37 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • George Murray, Bratislava wrote:

It is disappointing to observe what small minded, mean spirited people appear when a staggeringly successful and acclaimed industrialist is compromised by the gutter press for what is, after all, a private matter. Does anybody care any more what sexuality a person has? Shame on the society and legal system that allows this mischief to occur by a sad press rag against a significant contributor to Britain's current wellbeing. Surely there are enough targets among MP's, The Lord's and the judiciary to feed the suspect thrills of even the Mail on Sunday readers.

  • 32.
  • At 07:27 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Ed wrote:


He was over-rated, overpaid and also a liar. Good bye sweetie!

  • 33.
  • At 07:39 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • bob williams wrote:

Browne was honorable to resign to save the company from embarassment as he says. Could you see any of our self serving politicians being any where near as honest as Browne. No they would tell far more and bigger liese whilst still keeping their financial benefits.

  • 34.
  • At 07:42 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • guy wrote:

If Browne can cynically forswear himself - three times - in court documents one wonders how much faith one can have in his disingenuous protests that he did not improperly spend BP resources on his catemite?

  • 35.
  • At 07:54 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Simon Reynolds wrote:

Perhaps Browne will now do an Al Gore, and publicly express his personal views. He can now talk freely about the long term prospects for hydrocarbon extraction from the ground, namely that this business area must shrink dramatically over the next few decades. Perhaps we can get a preview by editing out the more obvious shareholder reassurances from his recent speech at Stanford:

  • 36.
  • At 07:56 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Paul wrote:

I recently left the company after a decade. His sexuality was well known. His use of the truth was also well known. I am afraid their are alot more skeletons in this cupboard.

  • 37.
  • At 08:21 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Carmel wrote:

Isn't it ridiculous that business is still in the dark ages and someone who has done so much for wealth creation. Lord Browne should be appluaded for his contribution and not hounded for his personal life.

  • 38.
  • At 08:22 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • David Powell wrote:

The recent history of BP indicates that all was not well within the organisation, which as the business pundits indicate was put in that position by the efforts mainly by Lord Browne. I believe that he will be remembered for images of city 'fat cats', deaths due to over eargerness to protect profits, environmental damage, due to the same, and perjury.
Let us not be too quick to shed a tear over the ethics followed by this individual.

  • 39.
  • At 08:40 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Ian Kemmish wrote:

I'm sure we've all made terrible errors of judgement over former lovers - particularly those who attempt a hatchet job on our reputation. You don't have to be gay for that.

What distinguishes this for me is that if he were not gay, the gutter press would presumably not have paid the slightest attention to what his former lovers had to say about him.

  • 40.
  • At 08:54 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Anthony wrote:

What a pity that Browne did not do Greek at school.
This has all the ingredients of a Greek trajedy. The man flies high and is brought down by an internal flaw.

If he had just said the truth, it would have blown over in a few days.
But,like Archer and Aitken, he had to lie and just like those two he now faces prison and derision.

Bring back Greek

  • 41.
  • At 09:00 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Gill Hicks wrote:

What does Jeff Chevalier want out of all of this?

  • 42.
  • At 09:04 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Joe wrote:

There is no "personal tragedy" here. He attempted to manipulate the court by lying, was found out, and has been duly punished.

  • 43.
  • At 09:05 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Joe wrote:

So what is the real issue here? The loss of a bonus? No. The fact that he lied under oath? No. The fact that a so-called news paper used the fact John Browne is gay to get back at him for slapping an injunction on them? YES!

BP has already investigated these claims and found no case to answer. Browne should have let them run this "story" and then sued the Mail on Sunday for every penny it has. And how stupid to try and blame Browne for the events at Texas City - try reading the indpendant report if you want to know the facts, or keep reading the Mail if you want fiction.

  • 44.
  • At 09:08 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Beyond Pathetic wrote:

Hmm... his lover sends and email saying " I have nothing to lose and need some money"....Browne says "no" and then a kiss and tell starts to emerge with the Mail! Gosh it must all be true. I mean a spurned lover would never lie about anything if presented with a cheque from a greasy hack organsiation would they?

what has a man's sexuality got to do with the media? Nothing!

  • 45.
  • At 09:20 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Dick wrote:

As an oil insider I have little regard for the way Browne ran BP and find the fact that he alledgedly lied using his position and his title as evidence of his integrity not at all surprising.

He is of course apparently good friends with Tony Blair. Perhaps lying is infectious.

  • 46.
  • At 09:31 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Ralph.williams@nec.ac.uk wrote:

The details of Lord Browns's personal life are not important. However, he has boosted BP's profits in the last ten years by systematic underinvestment in
maintenance, saftey and long term development. BP now faces falling reserves, falling income and massively rising costs. He should have been fired for incompetance, not allowed to resign.

  • 47.
  • At 10:17 AM on 02 May 2007,
  • Chris wrote:

While feeling sorry for Lord Browne, let's not lose sight of the fact that the origin of this mess is the decision of a gay man (Mr Chevalier)to sell his story about his relationship to a tabloid, presumably for a considerable sum.
As long as people buy the tabloids to read details of the private lives of the rich and famous, the tabloids will continue to pay for such stories.
Someone of Lord Browne's obvious intelligence would no doubt have realised what he was getting into from the start and the potential for this to happen one day.

  • 48.
  • At 02:01 PM on 02 May 2007,
  • Stuart wrote:

Lord Browne appears to have been more embarrassed about having met his partner through an agency than the fact of being gay, which was presumably well-known, if not openly discussed.

I met my wife through an agency, but have never disclosed that fact even to close family, maintaining the fiction that we met socially. I don't know why I feel so embarrased about it, but there is still a stigma attached, as though agencies are somehow a resort of the desparate.

However, I have to say that lying on oath in court seems excessive, and therefore represents very poor judgment on Lord Browne's part.

  • 49.
  • At 05:01 PM on 02 May 2007,
  • john wrote:

""Does anybody care any more what sexuality a person has? Shame on the society and legal system that allows this mischief ""

There are laws and there is Gods Law.
We can debate all we want but God is our judge and jury.

Lying is a sin with God
Gay sex is an abomination with God.
Its written in black and white.
God gave us law for our good because he loves us, he made us.

God doesn't care about our foolish opinions, ideas or ideals no matter how we all collectively try to avoid God's law.

and...Shame of "reporting it"? I think the real shame is people who say such falsehood as public life vs private life. All life is Gods. We each have one life. God's and He is the judge of our choices.

God hates sin.
But God loves sinners.
I am a sinner and need Jesus
Let us pray for Lord Browne.

  • 50.
  • At 06:42 AM on 03 May 2007,
  • Denise wrote:

It was common knowledge Lord Browne was gay...and who cares? Obviously the tabloids do!It is very sad that our society today,led by the Press,can ruin someone's life, in the blink of an eye! Agreed, Browne should not have lied but whose business is it how he met his companion!
He is an amazing man and has done wonders for BP......let's not forget that!I wish him luck and happiness.

  • 51.
  • At 10:06 AM on 03 May 2007,
  • jim wrote:

I wonder why Lord browne's advocate didn't guide him before the hammer fell upon his head!

  • 52.
  • At 11:17 AM on 03 May 2007,
  • Tony D wrote:

Many of the comments posted here & elsewhere refer to the alleged fact that it was known that Lord Browne was Gay by both BP insiders, journalists at large and the wider business community; as an ex-employee of BP I would agree with that assertion.

However, that being the case, why didn't the BP Board apply due dilgence to the Mail story when it surfaced in January and check the facts. Even a lowly DC could have discovered them quite easily.

However, the only fact that matters in this sad & sorry episode is that Lord Browne lied, presumably under oath, to a Court of Law. He has paid the price for that indiscretion not for where he chooses to meet his partners.

  • 53.
  • At 01:17 PM on 03 May 2007,
  • j. clarke wrote:

Hope the government look closely at Lord Brownes behaviour and consider withdrawing his title.
He may get just reward for acting in such a ruthless manner over company and employees during his tenure.
After all he too was an employee not a company owner or risk taker.
Disgruntled shareholder

  • 54.
  • At 12:43 AM on 04 May 2007,
  • Stewart wrote:

"Tall Poppy Syndrome" is perhaps not the most appropriate of phrases here, but how some of the Press love to have the Sun King one minute, gay old fool the next. By now we should really know to expect such behvaiour from the gutter press. For it is only through chequebook journalism that the Red Tops (and here I will also have to include the Daily Hell and Hell on Sunday) can increase/stabilise their cirlucation. This near-hysterical reaction is met with incredulity on the Continent. A for lying (repeatedly) under Oath, well that was just plain silly

  • 55.
  • At 04:15 AM on 10 May 2007,
  • Ben Bradley wrote:

For those who think the ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ doesn't properly report the news, I, as an American and with great shame, point you to this site, supposedly covering the same event, or at least using it to as part of a story on a "pink ceiling"

There is no mention of any sort of lie. the very strong and clear implication is that the exec was forced to resign solely because it came out that he was gay.

  • 56.
  • At 09:10 AM on 15 May 2007,
  • Ken Hulbert wrote:

perjury is when a lawfully sworn witness gives vital evidence which he knows to be false or does not believe to be true'

Vital?

  • 57.
  • At 05:16 PM on 18 May 2007,
  • Marcus Swalwell wrote:

what a strange range of rants!

1. if you were in his situation, would you describe "meeting" on a website or when you first actually met

2. comments usually say more about the reporter than the reported (God help the Daily Mail)

3. His real legacy is that BP a significant pillar of Britain - not a fallen icon like BA or Boots

its shaming that so many people have taken this opportunity to treat him as they would not accept being treated themselves

John Browne is an amazing man, makes you want to try a bit harder!

This post is closed to new comments.

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ iD

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.