Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Hope that you are diverting the surplus to the F1 coverage!?

This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ has removed so many links recently that it is unbelivable, many refering to F1 SKY deal.

where's the reduction in my licene fee? If you're not funding services the same as you were 2 years ago; then why has the licence fee not been reduced?

The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ aren't the only ones suffering in these difficult times, but now we will have to pay Β£600+ (excluding new telly) to follow our favourite sport, thanks to the appalling F1 sell-out.

Thanks Beeb.

I am delighted the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is trying to save some of the money it has been wasting.

I am asdo very proud that my comment at 2 above has now been under consideration since yesterday. It appears the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ thinks words, no naughty ones I assure you, can hurt as well as sticks and stones. Perhaps it is the the truth that hurts - save F1 from the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ's shameful deal with the forces of darkness!

P.S. I thought Ben Gallop was the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Sport blog editor - trying to stay out of the limelight are you Ben?

Hey Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ, Ben Gallop's salary must cost a bit, save some money there and bring back our F1 coverage that you sold out on! The more you keep closing the blogs, the more we'll just keep commenting on what matters to us!

Wonder how long this blog will stay open.

what do we all think of the F1 dwal then??

Hello, it's always good to see the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ cutting costs in the least used areas. The money should be focused on those areas with the most demand.

I imagine, for example, that you are looking at things like viewing ratings to determine exactly what it is that the license fee payer expects for their money and enjoys, and you will, for example, conclude that your award winning Formula 1 coverage is worth spending money on, while closing these lesser used services.

Oh wait. No, that would be far too sensible.

Stop the Sky/Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Formula 1 deal now. It's an utter disgrace.