Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Β« Previous | Main | Next Β»

War on words

William Crawley | 12:29 UK time, Saturday, 15 November 2008

D3207LD1.jpgJournalists are some of the worst offenders (as, indeed, is the phrase 'some of the worst offenders'). In our effort to turn out news bulletins, links for radio programmes, and live TV coverage of breaking stories, we turn to tired, worn-out, over-used (etc., etc.) phrases and terms that speed up composition and delivery.

Originality takes time, and time is in short supply. That's the justification that is often made for the poverty of English that corrupts our output. There is some merit to that explanation; but Oxford University wants us all to try harder in any case (and quite right too). They have compiled a list of the in current usage. I hear them all the time; and I confess to having used a few of them. Some are simply tired, like "at the end of the day"; some are logically incoherent, such as "fairly unique"; some are tautological, like "I personally"; some are grammatically incorrect, such as "shouldn't of"; some combine overstatement with overuse, such as "it's a nightmare', and some are just silly, like 'it's not rocket science'.

Also on the list is one of the two most overused words in Northern Ireland: 'absolutely'. The other is 'lovely'. I have no science to back up that claim, but how many times have you said 'absolutely' in response to a question when you meant 'yes'? And have you ever met a noun that couldn't be prefaced by 'lovely'? It's a lovely day, she's a lovely girl, that's a lovely cup of tea, he was a lovely man, it was a lovely holiday, we had a lovely time, and everyone was lovely to everyone else. I'm all for vastly increasing the measure of loveliness in the world; just not at the expense of a lovely word like lovely.

Enough of my linguistic ranting. Here's my pledge. This week, I will make a list of the most overused terms and phrases in current usage on the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ's output in Northern Ireland. I will type out that list and place it near my computer in the office, as a reminder to avoid these phrases. I may even publish it here. Let me have some of your suggestions, and not just from journalism: what's on your list of the most irritating phrases in common use?

While you're pondering that, have a look at the , an index of 3,300 available clichΓ©s.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.


    "Remanded in custody."


  • Comment number 2.

    In the man, Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ's war is not a war on words...but on the truth. For the past several years, I have rejected Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ as a reliable reporter of the news. Their reports are often biased, sometimes subtly and sometimes not so subtly. They have a large quiver of ammunition to choose from. This can range from instantly editorializing the news as they report it to selectively interviewing those whose opinions they agree with as though they were representative of the majority view or expert opinions. That have many others. Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ's value as a journalist has IMO been greatly diminished in the last decade or so, it now lives on a past reputation it no longer deserves.

  • Comment number 3.

    The two chliches that really irritate me (not necessarily used by the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ but often by the general public) are:

    (1) "Way to go" e.g. :

    if someone does something which is perceived as remarkable someone will shout "way to go William" !!!!!!

    (2) "Happy Days"

    So often used by salesmen for some strange reason.

    Grrrrrr. I cringe every time I hear these.

    Is "Happy Days " specific to Norn Iron ? I haven't heard used when I've visited mainland UK.

  • Comment number 4.


    Starting with an aside, I have more than a little sympathy with what Marcus is saying - the amount of speculation included in bulletins to provide an immediacy of response to an event is utterly annoying and often totally eclipses the reporting of the facts when they are known.

    To the main point - what utter tosh! Long live the cliche! If we rebranded it as a verbal topos perhaps it would gain the respect it actually deserves.

    The dons with too much time on their hands have ignored the use and utility of well-known (and well-worn) phrases throughout the oral traditions from which literature sprang. These phrases, by imaginative association, label characters, arouse emotions, compress actions and connect the most diverse material. The were the staple of early epic poetry and they have survived through the centuries to feature in everyday conversation, panto and Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ news reports because they work, they facilitate the processing and organisation of ideas and experience by the human brain.

    The rubbishing of the cliche is just another example of ill-thought elitism where a bunch of self-regarding pompous asses seek to denigrate unworthily those who are not "PLU".

    I might as well end on another aside: the valuing of originality is very much a modern notion - for most of history excellence in the treatment or use of the well-known was considered as being of much greater merit.

  • Comment number 5.

    The all-time worst offender has to be

    "In terms of..."

    It's so often used to convey absolutely no meaning whatsoever, that it really rankles my goat.

    It's a very very lazy way of relating anything to anything else, or else is completely superfluous

    "In terms of money, the Government is going to spend more"

    I recall one-time Culture Minister Poots on Question Time get so carried away that he answered every question with "In terms of it..."

    "How will Gordon Brown take to his new role as Prime Minister?"
    "Well, in terms of it, I think he'll do a good job."

    "What are the plans for the Maze/Long Kesh site?"
    "In terms of it, we don't know."

  • Comment number 6.

    Please ban 'wee' as in wee bill, wee cup of tea, wee minute, and so many more.

  • Comment number 7.



    In Evangelical Church services -

    "you know" "we really just wanna" "cool" "and,hey"

    Atheists should stop talking about
    "Brights" and "Supers" and driving around in buses to make themselves look relevant. They're starting to sound like evangelicals.
    Before too long they'll be having meetings with poorly conceived dramas and electric guitars.

  • Comment number 8.


    I am reading The Ginger Man for my book club and was pleased to find Donleavy put sentiments similar to my own in Dangerfield's mouth:

    Some fine cliches there. Should be encouraged. Too many damn people trying to be different. Coining phrases when a good platitude would do and save anxiety.

    What excellent company I do keep...

  • Comment number 9.


    Fair play to you portwyne.


Μύ

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.