Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ R&D Mobile Research
Post categories: mobile
| 12:03 UK time, Wednesday, 5 August 2009
Mobile research is ramping up here in FM&T. A chunk of our work is staying informed on technologies and trends, such as smart phone OSes (, ...) and runtime environments (, ...).
The possibilities and constraints of both browser-based and non-browser based are researched. There is always this tension in balance of breadth of device support versus employing more of the device features.
One upcoming area of work is centred on using the mobile phone as a remote control over other devices, such as digital video recorders, catering for accessibility. Another upcoming area will investigate possibile services around deployed in the home. A related area is handover between and .
The remote control research will investigate suitability of different wireless connectivity options (including , WiFi and mobile cellular networks), device discovery and UI presentation, along with supported accessibility options offered by different mobile runtimes.
Accessibility requirements lead to the possibility of separate media streams, as aids, being delivered over broadband to accompany a broadcast. This raises interesting challenges in media synchronisation between the mobile device and the TV, as the media originate in different networks.
For example, clean audio stripped of background music or sound effects could be delivered to the mobile's headset, for the hearing-impaired, alongside the video broadcast being watched on the TV. We're looking forward to very interesting research in this whole area shortly.
Femtocells aren't exactly a household name, so far. However, they have been in trials around the world including the UK. If deployed in the UK, they can enable some novel in-home mobile services. So here is some background on , starting with problems they are intended to address, followed by what femtocells do, ending with some possibile service ideas, which we will be experimenting with.
Some key issues for operators with 3G include indoor coverage, radio capacity and core network capacity.
The radio frequencies used for 3G are in the 2 GHz spectrum. Such frequencies have difficulty penetrating buildings etc. resulting in poor indoor coverage. So, a lot of the time, you can't get a signal in your home, and you can't rely 100% on being reachable on your mobile at home. Next, any mobile cell has a maximum (configured) amount of radio traffic that it can accomodate, and once "full" becomes inaccessible to new users until someone stops a voice or data call, or moves to an other cell. This radio capacity is shared across a cell and likely prioritised for voice traffic. High datarate services over 3G can rapidly consume capacity, meaning either a few happy folk per cell or everyone's service getting downgraded to accomodate newcomers. The core mobile network sits behind the radio access network (RAN: all the cells and connectivity to the core). The core has to bear all this traffic between the Internet and the RAN, so its capacity may need growing to support this accumulative traffic. The femtocell addresses these issues. (WiFi is discussed below).
Enter the Femtocell...
It's a complete 3G base station belonging to the operator's radio access network (RAN), located in your home (similar form factor to your wireless router). Don't worry about being fried. It radiates at very low power (a 1/10th of the power of your DECT phone). It gives 5-bar coverage in your home.
There should be no more lost incoming calls and voice/data traffic is seamlessly handed over between an outdoor cell and this indoor cell. Because of the proximity of the mobile phone to the femtocell, the mobile transmits at very low power - it's not trying to "shout" at an external macrocell which eats up battery. So battery life should be extended for your mobile activities (voice and data).
What about capacity and quality of service? An HSDPA-based femtocell, supporting say 4 users, offers peak raw data rates of 1.8 Mbps per user. (As with any cell, "raw" means all data over the air, including overheads with protocol headers, error correction etc. The datarate delivered to the mobile application is less).
That's a lot more than iPlayer needs. This will only improve with time if new versions support the higher datarates available through later modulation techniques. But the key point is that your services are running over licensed spectrum. The operator is in control of who gets to use what and hence can make guarantees on Quality of Service.
What about the backhaul? Femtocells can be integrated with the mobile network to offload data traffic direct to the Internet, without touching the mobile network core. So the net effect is reduced capacity requirements for the operator, and reduced latency for your data services.
Any mobile base station engages in mobility along with the mobile phone. As mobiles come in/out of range of a cell, the mobile network knows, so it can track where to route the mobile traffic. Think about what that means. Suppose software gets notified when you're entering or leaving the house. What could that do for automated media services? How about having your home "system" quietly load up your mobile each evening with stuff for your next day's journey? How about notifying your DVR that you've watched 15 minutes of Spooks on your mobile and the DVR knows to just serve up the remainder? Or vice-versa? You've got 10 minutes to go and the system requests the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ network to transcode this for your mobile and deliver it back quietly overnight to be transferred to your mobile. What about if your car had 3G and it prep'd for the next day's journey? These are all possibilities.
Since WiFi backhauls direct to the Internet also, the same statements can be made about reduction in mobile core capacity. WiFi operates in the unlicensed spectrum, so competes with other WiFi networks in the area, typically causing increased retransmissions.
Ofcom research has shown that about 90% of WiFi traffic is control traffic, leaving 10% for user data. See (page 6 especially). QoS guarantees can't be made. There have been various announcements concerning WiFi - 3G seamless handover. So, we will need to investigate this also, again looking at service opportunities triggered around mobility and entering / leaving the home network.
Jerry Kramskoy is a Senior Technologist (Future Media Infrastructure), Research & Development.
Comment number 1.
At 5th Aug 2009, Briantist wrote:Fascinating.
I can't help wondering if Femtocells are the wrong way of solving the problem.
If mobile phones with 3G also could connect to their operators networks via a home Wifi hub, even for a limited capacity as "wifi guests" this would allow the problem to be solved with new software on today's hardware.
Another point against femtocell is they would be, presumably operator specific boxes that would still need to use your personal broadband connection.
It just a question of which would be most acceptable to the user - two routers (one Wifi and one Femto) using Wifi for laptops and 3G for phones.
Or one router and 3G phones with built-in wifi.
Only time will tell. Oh, and how much it costs.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 5th Aug 2009, JerryKramskoy wrote:Hi Briantist,
3G spectrum is controlled and there are GSMA standards around femtocell management, whereas WiFi is still the wild west (with regard to neighbouring interference), so QoS is tough and WiFi is less advanced in its standardisation efforts here.
It will be very interesting to see how both technologies operate when there are multiple cells within interference range.
Point taken on one versus two routers ... perhaps we'll see a hybrid offering with both 3G and WiFi built-in.
Vodafone is offering its "Access Gateway" ranging from free to new customers, depending on choice of phone and service plan, up to 160 pounds with no contract.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 7th Aug 2009, cping500 wrote:Jerry you probably wont know the answer to this, but who is paying for this and other new media research to benefit the funds from the license fee and otherwise which the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ 'hold in trust' for all UK residents. There are two obvious possibilities, joint funding with commercial partners and exploiting the intellectual property rights in inventions, registerd designs and trademarks associates with new media.
Does the sale of a TV reception enabled phone in the uk generate a enquiry about having a TV license as does buying a TV set does?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 12th Aug 2009, U14099645 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 20th Aug 2009, SiSaun wrote:Jerry
Femto Forum (the industry association for femtocells) recently announced a special group focusing on common approaches to femtocell applications. Would be pleased to give you more details if you contact via the contact details on the Forum website www.femtoforum.org
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 2nd Sep 2009, wwdlu101 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 30th Mar 2010, U14402580 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)