鶹Լ

De Valera’s role in dismantling the Anglo-Irish Treaty

Photograph of Eamon de Valera.
Figure caption,
Photograph of Eamon de Valera

In March 1932, won the general election, partly because party leader Éamon de Valera had promised to sever links with Britain if he became head of the government.

He formed a government with the support of the Irish Labour Party.

De Valera aimed to dismantle the and achieve the maximum possible degree of independence from Britain.

To achieve this he wanted:

  1. To remove the links to Britain which existed through the post of , the Oath of Allegiance, the and membership of the .
  2. To secure the return of the .
  3. To control the Irish Free State’s foreign policy.

De Valera moved in stages to achieve his aims.

He adopted a cautious approach, keeping within the law in order to avoid British retaliation.

Back to top

Step 1: Abolishing the Oath of Allegiance

##

The first stage was abolishing the Oath of Allegiance to the British monarch.

Actions

  1. After coming to power, de Valera discouraged the members of the new from swearing the Oath of Loyalty to the British monarch.
  2. In January 1933, de Valera won a snap general election which, he claimed, indicated the public approved of his actions.
  3. In May 1933, the á passed the Removal of the Oath Act, eliminating the Oath of Allegiance.
Back to top

Step 2: The post of Governor-General was removed

The post of Governor-General, held by James MacNeill, was undermined and then abolished.

Actions

  1. De Valera stopped inviting MacNeill to official events and Government Ministers snubbed him. Eventually the British government recalled him to London.
  2. De Valera replaced MacNeill with Domhnall Ua Buachalla and gave him the title an seanascal (Chief Steward). His powers were limited, he never lived in the Governor General’s official residence and he undertook no official duties – except signing bills into law.
  3. The Governor-General’s ability to refuse for bills passed by the was removed in November 1933.
  4. The External Relations Act was introduced in December 1936 and resulted in the post of Governor General ceasing to exist.
Back to top

Step 3: The role of the Privy Council was ended

The had allowed Free State citizens to appeal the decisions of Irish courts, in criminal cases, to the in London.

In May 1933, the was changed to stop people making such appeals.

In 1935, London challenged these actions before the Privy Council.

It ruled that the 1931 Statute of Westminster (a law which set out the basis for the relationship between the British Crown and the members of the ) gave de Valera the power to make the changes he was making.

From that point on, the courts in the Irish Free State had the final say in law cases.

Back to top

Step 4: The authority of the monarchy was reduced

De Valera used the 1936 crisis to pass:

  • The Constitution Act- which removed all reference to the British monarch and the from the
  • The External Relations Act - which abolished the King's authority in the Irish Free State and resulted in the post of Governor General ceasing to exist.

However, the Free State remained a member of the and the monarch was still recognised as the Head of the Commonwealth.

Question

What was happening in Britain at this time?

Back to top

Step 5: Bunreacht na hÉann, 1937

De Valera drew up a new , Bunreacht na hÉann, in 1937.

This was because:

  • By 1937, de Valera had made so many changes to the terms of the that the 1922 constitution, which outlined how the government of the Irish Free State operated, was out of date.
  • He wanted to fulfil his 1932 election promise to sever links with Britain.
  • He wanted to take advantage of Britain being distracted by internal and external problems.

Bunreacht na hÉann made three significant changes:

  • The new name of the state was É (Ireland).
  • The leader of the Government was Taoiseach (Prime Minister).
  • A (mainly ceremonial) President, elected every seven years, replaced the monarch as the Head of State. Douglas Hyde became the first President in 1938.

Key terms

  1. Irish was recognized as the official language.
  2. The Catholic Church was given a ‘special position’ although ‘freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion’ was granted to other faiths.
  3. Article II claimed the right to rule over the whole island.
  4. Article III added that until partition ended, É’s laws would only apply to the 26 counties currently governed by Dublin

Within five years of coming to power, de Valera had successfully removed many of the limitations on the independence of the Irish Free State.

Ireland had become a in all but name.

Back to top

Reactions to Bunreacht na hÉann

Britain

The British had protested strongly at the actions taken by de Valera between 1932 and 1937.

They argued the Free State could not alter the terms of the except by mutual consent.

Yet, relations between Britain and É did not deteriorate as much as expected as London decided that these changes did not alter its relationship with Dublin.

Unionists

##
Figure caption,
Northern Ireland Prime Minister James Craig called a general election to bolster the unionist position

Bunreacht na hÉann reinforced Unionists’ insecurities as well as their determination to remain within the UK.

The Unionist government – based at Stormont since 1932 – strongly criticised Bunreacht na hÉann.

In particular it:

  1. Condemned
  2. Denounced the particular mention of the position of the Catholic Church and the Irish language.
  3. Protested against the removal of all references to the British monarch in the new .

Unionists were also annoyed with the British for not trying harder to stop de Valera.

Lord Craigavon (as Sir James Craig was known after 1927) used the opportunity to call a snap general election in 1938, resulting in an increased majority for his party.

Nationalists

Some historians believe that northern also had a lot to be dissatisfied with.

Despite the inclusion of , it could be argued that, by removing almost all links with Britain and the , the new had actually strengthened .

Nationalists were disillusioned because the constitutional changes had increased the determination of to stay part of the United Kingdom.

They were also increasingly disappointed in the Dublin government for not standing up and protecting their interests more.

They also felt isolated because the changes did not end against them.

É

The new was passed by a narrow majority in a ; this meant that de Valera had successfully removed the symbolic links between the Free State and Britain, but not all southern were happy as the Free State was not a completely independent republic and remained.

However, de Valera had his reasons for not calling É a .

He wanted to avoid alienating Northern nationalists, and the British and to ensure he did not betray those who had fought for an all-lreland Republic at

Back to top

WATCH: From Irish Free State to É

Back to top

Test your knowledge

Back to top

More on Changing relations: Northern Ireland and its neighbours, 1920-49

Find out more by working through a topic