Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Explore the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

24 September 2014
HampshireHampshire

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔpage
Β»









Sites near Hampshire



Related Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Sites


Μύ

Contact Us

tiny
Monday, 21 March, 2005 11:44
Hunting Ban - what are your views?
tiny
The New Forest Hounds
The New Forest Hounds
tiny

The New Forest was created as a royal hunting ground almost 900 years ago and hunting has taken place in the area ever since - hunting with dogs finally became illegal at midnight on 18th February, but should it be allowed to continue?

tiny
tiny
SEE ALSO
tiny
tiny
tiny
Messageboards
tiny
FACTS
tiny
The hunting with dogs ban is not just about fox hunting.
The law will also apply to:
- Hare hunting
- Hare coursing
- Mink hunting
- Stag hunting

It will become illegal to hunt any wild mammal with a dog; the only exceptions being rabbits and rats.
PRINT THIS PAGE
tiny
View a printable version of this page.
tiny
Get in contact
tiny

It's a subject that divides many, supporters say these activities are a traditional part of life in the countryside and an important part of the rural economy.

Opponents say hunting with dogs like this is a cruel and unneccessary way of keeping the number of foxes down.

Do you welcome the ban on hunting with dogs? Do you think it's about time or a loss to rural life? Add your comments here.

Rob, Eastleigh
Comment: Foxes are not cuddly friendly creatures, they can ruthlessly kill livestock, seemingly for fun, and do need to be controlled. HOWEVER, so called civilized people indulging in killing any creature, as a sport, with their fine clothes, drinkies and much laughter is sick, these people are lowlife. Resolution...Legalize hunting for up to six farm workers, with up to six hounds on their own land only. After all if my property were infested with rats, I would call a rat exterminator, but I'd send him away pronto if he arrived boozing , laughing and blowing his horn. We're not talking class war, town v country, or even if hunting is neccessary or not. We are talking common human decency !!!
<<Join the debate

kate, brockenhurst
Comment: Why on earth do pro hunters think that they have the right to kill something just because it has an instinct to kill itself? It is a wild animal, it is carnivorous by nature, we are not wild animals, or at least most of us are not. We have the ability to make a decision between right and wrong, and an ability to manage our livestock, should we choose to keep them, in a humane and decent manner. Another thing, with regards to populations getting out of control, before we started messing around with things, nature had it all rather sorted. Populations would follow a sinusoidal pattern, with predators populations falling as they prey got harder to find and then growing again once the prey had recovered.
<<Join the debate

andy t, bicester
Comment: Of course fox hunting is cruel, when I say cruel I mean the kill, but so is flushing a spider down the bath, or the cat being chased by a dog what about the cat that still hunts garden birds, even after being fed each day, that can't be denied and no one should attempt to deny it. But I believe that foxhunting should be allowed to continue it is a form of pest control maybe not the most efficient but it is at least one of the best at targeting foxes..
<<Join the debate

tommy, franklinton NC USA
Comment: I would just like to say that I think it is a shame that the heritage of such a great sport is no longer with us.
<<Join the debate

lisamarie, southampton
Comment: no one ever thinks of how many millions of animals foxes kill every year and how much desiese they spread. i think fox hunting should be allowed to continue and strongly disagree with all the allegations made such as "it is cruel" when really, do we have as many objections to the death penalty. it is just the same...foxes are murders and we are trying to save them!
<<Join the debate

Su Barlow, Fareham
Comment: There is so much talk about the cruelty to foxes, has anyone thought about all the chickens foxs kill, then taking just one away to eat? Leaving the others in the coop to die a painful, and often long death. How about all the hounds, pack animals, which can't be used as house pets, they are all going to have to be put to sleep. Hunts don't always catch a fox, often they don't, and only one hound kills the fox before the others move in to eat.
<<Join the debate

Robert Breen, Gosport
Comment: i think that Fox hunting is barbaric and should be band the people that do it think that they are abouve the law and say foxes are a pain in the backside, but living in gosport there are quite a few homeless people wich i feel are a pain but i dont run after them on a horse with 50 or so dogs wanting to rip them apart. i think they should ban it and if anybody breaks the law then they should be sent to prison and given community service to try and bring them back down to earth.
<<Join the debate

Linda, Waltham Chase
Comment: I cannot believe so many people misunderstand the nature of hunting. FACT The fox population HAS to be controlled. - They are the top of the food chain with no predator except man. So how do we control? Hunting weeds out the weak and the least fit and provides for a stong core population of Fox, (we still need some - they go some way to controlling the rats and rabbit population). There is at least a closed season from late spring to summer. - Whelping vixens are left to rear thier young in peace. The Hunting fraternity live ALONGSIDE their prey. Under this bill there is NO CLOSED SEASON.
<<Join the debate

Tracy, Milton Keynes
Comment: Being ripped apart by hounds is far worse than being shot. There are lots of reasons not to hunt, and yes, I think there should be a ban on fishing with hooks. Also I'm a vegetarian. Foxes don't know the difference between right and wrong, humans do.
<<Join the debate

Will Noble, New Forest
Comment: I was born and brought up in the New Forest in a commoning family (those who have the right of panage to graze their livestock on the open forest). I have chose not to hunt because my feelings toward hunting are largely neutral. Centralised government policy is resulting in the steady erosion of the rural community and economy. Vastly inflated house prices combined with this ban and the transition of the forest to a National Park spell the end of the New Forest as we know it not just for those who call it home, but for the many visitors it attracts each year.
<<Join the debate

Neil Larder, Southampton
Comment: how is hunting with dogs cruel?? Shooting a fox is worse than being killed quickly by the hound. For starters the fox may be shot in the wrong place and then left to suffer for weeks, at least the fox is killed in seconds with hounds. The Pro hunters have so many reasons to keep hunting, such as it keeps the numbers down/ the farmers dont lose as much money as not so many of there livestock is killed/ shooting a fox can be worse than killing it with hounds. What reasons do the Anti hunters have, a pathetic ' its cruel',i bet non of them have even gone to a hunt before so therefore dont have a clue. SO if hunting with hounds is bad what will be next, a ban on fishing with hooks??
<<Join the debate

Chris, waterlooville
Comment: Excuses, excuses, that’s all we hear from the well to do hunting fraternity. Lame reasons as to why their so called sport should continue. Foxes kill chickens, yes I agree, but surely this has been greatly reduced by battery farming for more profit (with not much thought given to the chicken) rather than free range farming. Foxes also kill pheasant and partridge; these birds are also farmed for profit and especially sport. It’s no wonder they want to protect this species as they come under the heading of game bird. Released into the wild, only to be flushed out and then blown apart by guns, another blood sport enjoyed by the well to do? They say they are concerned about the amount of jobs that would be lost, did they show any concern about the thousands of British coal miners that lost their jobs. Let the same rules apply, re-skill. As far as being able to police this new ban and to bring to justice those who offend, will prove very difficult. We must bear in mind that a good percentage of the judiciary service also take part in this barbaric so called sport. Lets hope that this ban sticks, and those who offend are prosecuted. It must not become one law for the rich and one law for the poor.
<<Join the debate

Freya. 14,, Petersfield
Comment: This is to that twelve year old kid. If you think that hunting is cruel you better get your facts straight! I HAD 6 chicken and a fox came along ripped them all to shreds and LEFT them. He didn't even eat them! So you acnnot put your word in and also I doubt you eat free range meat or anything like that! Think about those poor animals!
<<Join the debate

Sophie , Bishops Waltham
Comment: I am pleased that Fox hunting has finaly been banned. They have been on about it for years but nothing has been done about it. It is cruel and I can not see how people can enjoy watching animals being killed.
<<Join the debate

carol king, Carmarthen
Comment: It saddens me that one more freedom hs been banned. To those who say foxes are ripped apart, I say you have never watched a kill. A lead hound always snaps the neck and the fox is dead before the other hounds move in. Yes foxes can be shot but you have to have excellent marksmen to do it. I have had to put more than one fox down that was dying from gangrene after being shot. What next will be banned?
<<Join the debate

Ivan Collins, Andover
Comment: I was brought up in the country but moved into the town when we could not afford a house in the village we lived. If it is the chase these poeple like why doesn't the master cover himself with the smell of the fox, run ahead of them and let them chase him, they get the thrill of the chase and he gets the thrill of being chased, they all win
<<Join the debate

Brian Clarke, Bournemouth
Comment: The only reason the fox exists in many areas of the country is because of fox hunting. Once hunting stops, farmers will shoot the foxes and clear the copses where they live to make the use of machinery easier. I think that in five years time, the only foxes will be in the towns.
<<Join the debate

tony shaw, emsworth
Comment: do the people i've seen on the tv realise how stupid and pathetic they look protesting that they can no longer rip inocent animals to pieces - they can still have their fun and ride around the country without harming the rapidly disappearing wildlife we have...
<<Join the debate

Paul Rutherford, Alresford
Comment: Cliff Brown fro Eastleigh asks why we do not settle for Drag Hunting? I have ben to a Drag Hunt that was attacked by members of the League Against Cruel Sports! This is proof - if proof were needed -that animal welfare is not a consideration for those who oppose hunting, they oppose the people who hunt, and have no real feeling or knowledge of the animal hunted. By the way, I do not, myself, hunt.
<<Join the debate

Jo, havant
Comment: i have grown up with horses all my life and been in the countryside and have never wanted to go fox hunting, i cant belive all the fuss that is being made about this ban. How anyone can belive that chasing a fox accross fields then watching it being ripped appart by dogs can be called a sport or be called fun. Fox's can be controled by being shot by gamekeepers. There will be no need for job cuts because they can go drag hunting, this means they always know they will have a good ride, they can plan the route and stay away from any danger areas. Just because it has been done for a long time doesnt mean it should carry on, they dont still hang people do they?
<<Join the debate

JOHN DEWDNEY, Poole
Comment: I think that the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ has been pro hunting bias in its News presentations. In the South News this morning long coverage was given to the hunt and its supporters without giving any anti hunting views, and in the main news tonight one anti hunting representative was only allowed to say about three sentences compared with the long exposure given to the hunters. I think from the very start the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ has not given a balanced report on hunting. It has given far too much time to this subject. If as much time was given to reporting the plight of old age pensioners and their protests as given to the poor plight of the tearful hunting fraternity, perhaps pensioners would get a fair deal at last.
<<Join the debate

Gwen Richardson, Broadstone
Comment: I am against the ban. What about the lambs who are torn to pieces? I have foxes coming to my back door. I am scared to leave the back door open for fear that they will soon be in my kitchen. Foxes are not always beautiful animals. They carry mange and fleas etc. and are killers. They must be kept under control and what better way than to leave this to country folk who know what they are doing.
<<Join the debate

Rachael M, Sheffield
Comment: Also... I AM A COUNTRY FOLK. THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNTRYSIDE WANT TO SEE THIS BARBARIC PASTIME BANNED FOR GOOD.
<<Join the debate

Rachael McDougall, Sheffield
Comment: Canabalsim carried on for generations on the island of Fiji - does THAT make it right? No... it does NOT mattery how many times a fox is caught. They are still caught, caused to suffer and be killed of disembowellment. 20,000 foxes die each year because of these brutes. BAN HUNTING - FOR IT IS CRUEL.
<<Join the debate

A.M.P, New Forest
Comment: I come from the Rural New Forest & while I have never wished to partake in Fox hunting I have become a supporter & am totally against this ban because I believe in Democracy & a minimal amount of state intervention in the lives of it's citizens rather than the now popular Nanny state. The emotive & simplistic cliche, that those who hunt are barbaric is constantly thrown in by the anti's, but only shows how little understanding & depth their is to there arguement. True Democracy is not just about what the majority wants & should always respect & tolerate the views of others. The hunting ban seems to have been brought upon us by the I don't like brigade & a goverment which thinks it knows what is best for it's citizens & as so bans, bans, bans. Their is no valid reason for only banning fox hunting. The eating & wearing of meat leather & fur all involve the killing of animals for human pleasure, as does pest control & as so surely should have been included in this ban.
<<Join the debate

amy, larne
Comment: it should NOT be banned cause it has being happening for generations after generations. only one out of 10 foxes are killed when they are hunted.
<<Join the debate

Lucy Joyce age 12, carmarthen
Comment: OW MY GOD I cant belive what this world is coming to. I cant belive some people have FUN ripping up a poor defeceless animal not just foxes, stags and hares. The people who go hunting give us this story : But they kill all our chickens and how are we ment to keep them under control. Do u no wat i say I say well thats all bull ok we kill cows,pigs,chickens and turkey and loads loads more. We dont do it for fun outher people kill foxes for fun thats wron.
<<Join the debate

Rachael McDougall, Sheffeild
Comment: The problem is, Mark, that we are living with Animal Cruelty as an accepted sport! What do you mean for nature to toy around with?! Nature is not a Toff that rides on Horses with 30 Hounds going around comitting Animal Cruelty. If we were at war, we would not eat our most loved ones. We have about 5 billion years left on Earth before the sun explodes. It is not a case of "We have to abuse as much of every thing while we have the time on Earth!", it is to try to make the most of the time we have left, to make sure everyone has a good life, not destroy everything natural.
<<Join the debate

Does it really matter?

What are all the green groups going to do when an asteroid threatens this planet, worry about foxes. We are all genetic fodder for nature to toy with so what's the problem?

If we were at war now you would eat anything that moved and like it, even your pets. Enjoy fox hunting, use the trees, forward the technology, colonise planets, use the resource, nature does. We will eventually use technology to put it all back.
Mark, Ringwood
<<Join the debate

I do not think Fox Hunting should be banned because it has been a tradition in the forest and we do not know the changes to the forest that banning fox hunting would cause. When the Buck Hounds were forced to stop hunting, do you know that a whole herd of deer has to be rounded up and shot. I did not witness this, but what is crueller, shooting a whole herd of deer, or hunt them, where only the old and week would be killed? The deer have to be culled!

Also the same happens to colts. The forest has to be managed and colts grow into stallions and we cannot have too many on the forest, so the colts are rounded up and if they are not brought, they have to be slaughtered. People are too quick to want to ban things in this country and not think of the outcome. The forest cannot sustain a vast amount of animals and that is why we have the forest because of all the people that have hunted and worked on it for years and years and we should appreciate the hard work and efforts they have achieved for us to have a forest at all.
Debbie Allan, New Milton
<<Join the debate

WHY DO BOTH SIDES KEEP BRUSHING THE ANSWER UNDER THE CARPET? Drag hunting would please both sides. No job losses. No slaughter through cruelty. End of argument! Are both sides so eager to perpetuate the debate? To what ends?
Cliff Brown, Eastleigh
<<Join the debate

A question for Sheila Reed....I am perplexed. If foxes are so dangerous why do they use dogs to hunt them down? ...........Just curious....
Gail Gibbons, Waterlooville
<<Join the debate

Killing for fun ....How sad is that. I was bitten once by a small dog - it was like having your hand crushed in a vice.

Huntsmen should be hunted by their own dogs - maybe they would not be so keen to inflict such suffering in future. Alternatively they could just get a life!
Paul Judd, Croydon
<<Join the debate

Animals are hunted and killed by man throughout the entire world - from France to USA, Australia to Japan - the UK is the only country where some (not all) people feel they have the right to stop other peoples livelihoods and leisure time activities just because they personally don't like whats going on. It will not stop at hunting - shooting and fishing will soon follow. Fishing especially is one of the most popular leisure activities in this country, enjoyed by all strata of society (so is hunting).

If only all the venom and resources directed against people on horses chasing foxes could be directed against child cruelty, pornography, drug related crime and the real cruelty inflicted on so called 'pets' in homes up and down the country. The ordinary European and American cannot believe such time and money is wasted here on trying to save one small animal who would probably have been exterminated long ago like the wolf and buffalo if not for "hunting".
Felicity Young, Lymington
<<Join the debate

Everyone in the "sport" is fully aware that Drag Hunting could take the place of fox hunting without change or job losses. Further to this hounds could be led away from hazards like Railways, main roads and domestic stock/pets. Safer for all concerned.The only difference would be the lack of a kill (but the hunt will say this isn't why they do it)oh ..and the exclusivity.

The New Forest drag hunt has started very well. Remember- no job losses, no "OUT" season, no protesters, so why not? If the hunt whish to organise shooting parties to "Control" foxes, I'm sure they wouldn't be short of volunteers, it would show that they DID realise that times change and they could too..and survive.
Cliff Brown, Eastleigh
<<Join the debate

Could the commentator from Kansas note that there is mounted hunting in the States. And the woman from Southampton is wrong in thinking this is a 'rich' man's sport. I have a horse which i work full time to be able to afford with no new cars or nice holidays. And I do hunt occasionally, there's no way you could call me rich! Also hunting has a 'season' that is outside of the breeding season. Because foxes are controlled through natural selection, the old or sick are the ones most likely to be caught, and the ones that are fit and strong are dispersed away from the area that they have been causing trouble. In this way the species is preserved. No hunter wants to erridicate all foxes, just control the numbers. I hope to see all you pro-hunting lot at the Countryside March in September.
Sacha Shaw, Ferndown
<<Join the debate

If this were a poor man's sport, it would have been banned years ago. It's barbaric and should be stopped!
John Lloyd, Southampton
<<Join the debate

The hunting fraternity will proclaim that they do not do it for pleasure but to reduce "vermin". So, why then is there a "season"? Surely reduction of vermin would be a continuous task? Having been to many hunts (as a former member of the HSA - I'm too old to run fast enough now!)

I can assure anyone that the ONLY reason is for pleasure and the pleasure of killing at that, one can see it on their faces at the kill, and it is not a pretty sight!
Patrick O'Neill, Eastleigh
<<Join the debate

Don't ban fox hunting. People that say to ban it have twisted minds and only select out the cruel parts. Read the other stuff! Don't ban it!
Milipede, Southampton
<<Join the debate

The bill for the banning of hunting with hounds contains legal specifics which would place law abiding, tax paying citizens who own dogs at risk from prosecution. Obviously Jo Public is unaware that foxes spread Toxacariasis, (which can blind) through their feaces and unlike domestic dogs are not wormed and run freely all over suburbia. So while the responsible dog owner is abused and restricted from open spaces, the fox runs free, vermin.
Sheila Reed, Winchester
<<Join the debate

Fox Hunting most definitely should be banned. Hunting with a pack of dogs is sick. Why can't they come out of the middle ages when it was the practice of the sick so called upper classes to chase defenceless predators with a pack of hounds. When caught would be torn to shreds.

If they want to protect their chickens why not fence them in. The only vermin that should be destroyed by hunting are the hunters themselves. What a sad sick country we live in.
D Morgan, Salisbury
<<Join the debate

Its part of our heritage? our culture? Really... Have we not advanced and improved ourselves - look around you are we still living in the middle ages? NO!

This is a blatant excuse for pyschopaths with a desire to kill and plunder in one of the cruelest and most offensive of manners. If you want to release stress and tension there are far better ways of doing it. Furthermore hunting is the skill and silent tracking plus quick and painless death of an animal not the reckless chasing and hysteria that is created as is common with fox hunting...This sick perverse idea of a so called sport MUST BE BANNED - It's not a sport - find something more productive to do with your time!
Gail Gibbons, Waterlooville
<<Join the debate

Thank god, foxhunting isn't done or even thought of in our country. But in the English countryside, people who foxhunt are lacking common sense. Every English country resident thinks they're monsters. They are NOT! They are wild animals that are trying to thrive on their own. Simply clashing the fox's territory with human society to kill it won't solve the problem. Many English farmers are ignorant to know this fact, but many biologists have studied wolves, foxes, and coyotes and it is a stated fact that wild canids have an in-built method of population control that we as humans merely get.

In my opinion...FOXHUNTING SHOULD BE BANNED IN THE UK! It is a rather odd and out dated tradition that has no room in the 21st century.
Matt , Kansas City
<<Join the debate

Harriet,

Comment: In response to Matt from Kansas - I live in the US, although I am from Hampshire, and I fox hunt twice a week in the US - so before you express your opinion on our country, perhaps you should learn a little about your own.

The americans who are members of the hunt where I live are outraged and amazed that Enland is trying to ban fox-hunting - and so am I.

In addition to fox hunting, almost every wild animal that lives in the US is hunted.

I do not know many people who do not possess a gun, and who spend their weekends shooting deer, doves & coyotes. And from a country where you still have the death penalty, I would say fox hunting is really quite tame in comparison.

<<Join the debate

Although I live in an urban area I am an Equine student. When I began to study horses and the rural industry I was against Fox Hunting. This is because I had only seen the 'towny' view of things. In cities foxes do not hunt lambs and chickens but feed from dustbins. They can cause harm to domestic pets and if hunting were to be banned, the number of foxes would increase and overtake the land.

Now I understand about the importance of hunting for the country and also the equine industry, I would not allow it to be banned. It will be interesting to see what happens in Scotland and the fate all of Britain may be driven to. A last thought is that the welfare of the fox will suffer if hunting is banned. Whereas now if there are many fox attacks more hunting takes place, if it was banned each farmer woud shoot a fox even if it was the same fox which attacked two farms. If I were a fox I would rather die quickly than be shot, become gangrenous, and starve because I couldn't hunt.
Alexa Mason, Portsmouth
<<Join the debate

As you say, the New Forest has been a hunting ground for 900 years. I would have it as a guess that the hunting & hunting fraturnity have ensured that a viable & renewable balance of nature have seen to this long co-exsistance. It is impossible for a diverse expance of wildlife to exist if the main preditors are not controlled. As much as I respect all animals; to lose sight of this would undermine another lesser down the pecking order.
Kate Nicholson, Ambleside
<<Join the debate

Although I do not hunt I feel that so much life and vitality of the Forest depends indirectly on Hunting that it should continue. To ban it would ultimately change radically the nature of the New Forest, which was established and owes it very existence to the hunting of wild animals.
Peter Murphy, Lyndhurst
<<Join the debate

Foxhunting should NEVER be banned. It provides jobs for rural communities as well as an effective method of pest control. Foxes are a danger to livestock - they carry disease, are indiscriminate killers and kill far much more than they actually need.

If the fox wasn't furry and red and "cute" no-one would bother about killing it! Or if it killed your pets! Most animal rights protesters have never even seen the countryside! They just see some awful pictures and believe everything they are told about the cruelty etc. I'll bet that they are never shown pictures of the damage a fox does to lambs and fowl. The government should concentrate on people who hurt animals for fun, not necessity. Concentrate on banning the transport of live horses.
Jane German, Preston
<<Join the debate
Μύ
tiny
line
tiny
Top | Features Index | Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ
tiny
tiny
tiny
Also in features
tiny
tiny
What's on
tiny

Films
Latest Reviews

Film festival

Film Finder


Location South


tiny
Webcams
tiny
Contact Us
Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Southampton Website
Broadcasting House,
Havelock Road,
Southampton
SO14 7PU
(+44) 023 80 374370/1/2
southampton@bbc.co.uk



About the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy
Μύ