Ukraine - to intervene or not to intervene.
Michael Buerk chairs debate examining the moral issues behind one of the week's news stories. With Anne McElvoy, Ash Sarkar, Matthew Taylor and Tim Stanley.
President Putin insists that he has no intention of invading Ukraine. In amassing troops and weapons along the border, the Russians are merely βprotecting their national interestsβ. Meanwhile NATO, the US-European military alliance, is busy reinforcing its eastern member states with ships and planes. Our own Prime Minister has issued dire warnings that Russia will not be allowed to harass a smaller neighbour in this way. So, who is right? Is there a moral imperative for us to protect a fledgling democracy that seems to be under threat? What, if anything, can we β or should we β do to support Ukraine? And what moral arguments do we have, to help us decide?
Perhaps this is just aggressive posing by both sides that will drift on and die down. But what if it becomes something more? What if it embroils us in a European war? And if that happens, who will be to blame? Given the record of the UK and the West in Afghanistan and Iraq, do we even have the appetite for another foreign intervention? Is the very idea morally dubious? And, in any case, doesnβt the size of Russiaβs nuclear arsenal make it impossible for us to call Putinβs bluff? With Global Governance Professor Mary Kaldor; Russia Expert Keir Giles; Newspaper Columnist Simon Jenkins and Kyiv University Political Scientist Taras Kuzio.
Produced by Olive Clancy
Last on
More episodes
Broadcasts
- Wed 26 Jan 2022 20:00ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ Radio 4
- Sat 29 Jan 2022 22:15ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ Radio 4
Podcast
-
Moral Maze
Live debate examining the moral issues behind one of the week's news stories. #moralmaze