Covid Restrictions: Care Â鶹ԼÅÄs And London Underground
The impact limits on care home visits can have for blind and visually impaired people.
A change to the way Covid restrictions are implemented on the London Underground.
Peter Wilkins tells us about the loss of his wife who died in a care home he was barely allowed to visit due to Covid restrictions. He says the isolation felt by those with sight loss in care homes is unbearable.
And London Underground changes its policy for blind and visually impaired users. Physically assisted guidance is resuming after it was stopped for eight months due to Covid.
PRESENTER: Peter White
PRODUCER: Mike Young
Last on
In Touch transcript: 17/11/20
Downloaded from www.bbc.co.uk/radio4
Ìý
THE ATTACHED TRANSCRIPT WAS TYPED FROM A RECORDING AND NOT COPIED FROM AN ORIGINAL SCRIPT.Ìý BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF MISHEARING AND THE DIFFICULTY IN SOME CASES OF IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS, THE Â鶹ԼÅÄ CANNOT VOUCH FOR ITS COMPLETE ACCURACY.
Ìý
Ìý
IN TOUCH – Covid Restrictions: Care Â鶹ԼÅÄs and London Underground
Ìý
TX:Ìý 17.11.2020Ìý 2040-2100
Ìý
PRESENTER:Ìý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý PETER WHITE
Ìý
PRODUCER:Ìý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý MIKE YOUNG
Ìý
Ìý
Ìý
White
Good evening.Ìý It’s fair to say that our programme title has never been more appropriate than over the past few months.Ìý Many of you were very quick to point out that visually impaired people’s need to experience the world by touching was going to cause some very knotty problems in the face of coronavirus restrictions and you were quite right.Ìý So, tonight, we’ll be trying to find out why visually impaired listeners are telling us that they’re being refused physical assistance on the London Underground.
Ìý
Clip
If I’m wearing a mask and a member of staff is wearing a mask and if I sanitise my hands, if I take their elbow, I absolutely don’t see any risk.
Ìý
White
We’ll be asking Transport for London why this is happening on the Tube when other rail operators are offering physical guidance.
Ìý
And nowhere has lack of physical contact been more heart-breaking than with the restrictions placed on people wanting to visit sick or dependent relatives in hospitals and residential care homes, especially those nearing the end of life.Ìý There have been many painful stories and it now looks as if there are some serious attempts being made to introduce more flexibility, including piloting on-site testing for visitors in residential care homes.Ìý But this has all come too late to help In Touch listener Peter Wilkins and his wife, Linda.Ìý Both totally blind they’ve been happily married for 47 years but when Linda had to go into hospital, earlier this year, at the start of pandemic – not with coronavirus – the timing could not have been worse.
Ìý
Peter has been telling me about Linda and their life together.
Ìý
Wilkins
We met in 1963 at secondary school, went to college together, courted for a couple of years – Lancashire versus Yorkshire – and then we married in 1973.Ìý Eventually Linda got a job as a braille proof reader at the National Library for the Blind, which was in Manchester at the time, and I worked there as a typist.Ìý She was very kind, very gentle, I’d never known her harm anyone and it’s just a pity that her last few years were dogged with medical problems, which eventually made it that she couldn’t walk and her memory began to fade in the last three months as well.
Ìý
White
And as Linda became ill how much did she come to rely on you?
Ìý
Wilkins
After March this year, when she couldn’t walk, I did nearly everything for her.Ìý She could dress herself, she could wash herself but everything else had to be done by me.
Ìý
White
Now Linda first went into hospital, I think, and then a care home.Ìý So, during this year, with pandemic restrictions, how much could you see her?
Ìý
Wilkins
When she went into hospital at the end of July and she died 21st October, I only got the chance to see her in a nursing home just before our wedding anniversary, which was in August, because she was having problems with the telephone – she couldn’t remember how to use her phone and the staff couldn’t use it because it had no screen, it was a specific phone for blind people.Ìý So, I went in and had a look at the situation, found the wi-fi and the mobile phone signal were no good on the ground floor.Ìý So, they kindly moved her up to the first floor, where there was a wi-fi signal.Ìý And then the following Tuesday, which was our 47th wedding anniversary, they let me in to see her for an hour and I was able to sort out the communications problem.
Ìý
White
But just generally, how difficult was it – you must have had a sense over this period when you weren’t able to see her that there were probably quite a lot of things that you would want to help her with.
Ìý
Wilkins
That’s right, yes, and I could ring the hospital or nursing home or care home and they’d say she was okay and I’d find out the next day that she hadn’t been, somebody had not told me something.Ìý Because I couldn’t get to Linda, I didn’t know whether she did have any problems or not and couldn’t do anything about it if she did.
Ìý
White
Just explain, because there was an opportunity to see her in the end, explain the conditions under which you were able to be with her.
Ìý
Wilkins
I went into the nursing home two months before she died and I had to put on a polythene apron and some gloves, which were useless because as soon as I put my fingers in they went through the ends anyway – very thin, rubber gloves.Ìý I wasn’t able to get close to Linda, I was about four feet away sitting in a chair and she was lying in her bed.Ìý We could just speak to each other.Ìý
Ìý
White
I’m really trying to get this picture because, as a blind person myself and you are and Linda was, can you just explain the frustration of that – it would be frustrating for any couple but for two blind people touch is so important isn’t it.
Ìý
Wilkins
Yeah.Ìý She asked me, when I went to see her in August, the last time I saw her, she asked me if I could give her a kiss and I said – I’m not allowed to because of the virus.Ìý I wasn’t allowed to hold her hand or anything, it was just talking.Ìý But I didn’t know that when I left her on that morning that it would be the last time I would be with her.
Ìý
White
Did staff understand that for two people who couldn’t see each other, having a form of contact was crucial in a way?
Ìý
Wilkins
The nursing home where she died were excellent and that’s why they let me in on that particular day, to help with her communications and to be with her on our special day.Ìý But the previous care home and the hospital, I’m sorry, but I don’t think they had any understanding at all.Ìý I was losing quality time, I wanted to say things and hold her hand, give her a kiss or something, you know, and it just wasn’t there – wasn’t allowed to do it.Ìý And, as I say, at the time when she asked me and I couldn’t, I didn’t realise that would be the last time I’d see her.
Ìý
White
No, you must feel terrible about that really.
Ìý
Wilkins
I do, I can’t put it back.
Ìý
White
Peter, you were offered things such as, I think, window visits by the care home, what was your reaction to that?
Ìý
Wilkins
Well I have to say, that window visits – two reasons weren’t acceptable.Ìý One is that she was on the first floor, so that wouldn’t be very good and the other because we’re both blind and she wouldn’t hear me through the window, so it seemed to me it was not worth having.Ìý That’s why I was pleased when they moved her up to the first floor because at least we had some form of telephone contact.
Ìý
White
Now obviously you appreciate why these restrictions have been in place, you must have raised these issues several times with people, I just wonder what kind of reaction you got and whether you think the special circumstances that you were in were appreciated by people.
Ìý
Wilkins
I think they were by the nursing home, when I went to see her in August, on our wedding anniversary, I think they were sensitive to that, which is why they chose that day for me to go back in – they asked me to go back in, I didn’t ask them.Ìý We discussed it but they were tied with the regulations, they couldn’t do anything else for me.
Ìý
White
Now although Linda was ill her death, I believe, I was unexpected.Ìý Had you and the care home known, do you think things might have been different?
Ìý
Wilkins
I know that the care home subsequently said to me that had they known she was nearing the end of life they would have invited me in.
Ìý
White
Now as we record this interview there does seem to be some movement, serious thought being given to ways of making it easier for people to have more regular contact with relatives in hospital, what do you think about what you’ve heard so far and what would work for people like you and Linda?
Ìý
Wilkins
Well if they have these screens, floor to ceiling screens, I don’t know whether they transmit sound.Ìý If they didn’t then a hard-line phone connection would be good and I would be on one side of the screen, Linda would be on the other and I would prefer that to having nothing at all.Ìý I felt that as people were going in and out of her room, dressed in the PPE looking after her, if I had the right PPE on, whatever it took, space suit, whatever it was, I feel if I could be given something to wear to give me full protection and her full protection then I would have done it, to spend some quality time with her in the last few months of her life.
Ìý
White
It must be frustrating, in a way, to know that at last people are perhaps trying to think of ways round it.
Ìý
Wilkins
Yeah, I’m pleased if my raising of this has done any good, then I feel that it’s not in vain.
Ìý
White
And our sincere thanks to Peter Wilkins for being prepared to talk to us about this.Ìý If any of you have been in a situation, anything like this, and feel able to tell us about it we’d be very interested, particularly if practical and appropriate solutions were found.
Ìý
Now we’re getting a steady flow of listeners’ experiences on the London Underground coming in to our email inbox, with a key concern being the continued refusal of physical assisted guidance due to covid restrictions.Ìý Now you’re telling us that Transport for London staff have been, on some occasions, unwilling to offer an arm to help negotiate a station and while a number of our emails praise the usual helpfulness of Underground staff it’s the inconsistency which is bothering people.Ìý And this is despite such guidance, still being on offer, everywhere else on the rail network.Ìý Plastic sleeves are being used as an extra protection measure.Ìý
Ìý
Naki Rizvi is totally blind and he speaks for many of you.
Ìý
Rizvi
My issue is it doesn’t make any sense because if I’m wearing a mask and the member of staff is wearing a mask and if I sanitise my hands, if I take their elbow, I absolutely don’t see any risk.Ìý In fact, when I’m walking beside them and they’re trying to keep their distance, I bump into them a lot more than I would if I just took their arm.Ìý So, that, to me, doesn’t really make any sense.Ìý But also, I’ve asked a few of the members of staff around why we have these issues and they talk about them not having funding for the plastic sleeves and all that stuff and again that doesn’t make sense to me.Ìý The plastic sleeves obviously are very, very cheap, if they can afford to provide a taxi to a VIP, I don’t see why plastic sleeves should cost anything.Ìý But also, I’ve taken the taxi three times and all of those times it’s been a very negative experience.Ìý In one of the stations a member of staff wasn’t willing to guide me, even to the taxi, and had to request someone from National Rail to guide me.Ìý And I’ve had to ask the public for assistance, which isn’t the safest way of doing things either.
Ìý
White
But Naki, do you understand why TFL and the unions feel they have to be very careful about the safety of their employees and their members?
Ìý
Rizvi
I absolutely appreciate that.Ìý I think we need to be sensible about it and we need to take the right precautions but if we’re wearing masks and if I sanitise my hands in front of them, if they wear a plastic sleeve, I don’t see what risk there is because I’m not making any contact with them.Ìý And a bit like what National Rail do, if they wear a sleeve and if I take their arm, as soon as they’ve assisted me, they can chuck the sleeve away and that’s it.
Ìý
White
And Naki Rizvi isn’t alone in feeling let down.Ìý Back in September 18 year old Kelsey Trevett from Watford was refused any assistance at Harrow-on-the-Hill station.Ìý He ended up on his own and having to video call his dad who then verbally guided him.Ìý TFL apologised in this case and they said that Kelsey should have been verbally guided by staff.
Ìý
Well speaking in the London Assembly, the City’s Transport Commissioner, Andy Byford, was clearly shocked.
Ìý
Byford
I was a little taken aback when I heard about that actually, it seemed somewhat callous to let someone with visual impairment to say that you’re not going at least offer them verbal direction if there’s some reason why you’re not going to offer them your arm.Ìý So, I think it is about getting the balance right between maintaining safe distancing, social distancing, but it does seem odd that there’s a difference between what the mainline does and what the Tube does and that’s certainly something that I will be following up with the Chief Customer Officer, to be better understand why that occurred in the first place and to be certain that we’ve rectified things in the interim.Ìý I don’t mind saying, I’m very sorry to the person concerned, that must have been an horrendous experience and I cringed when I read about that actually.
Ìý
White
London Transport Commissioner Andy Byford speaking on October 8th.Ìý ÌýBut almost six weeks later there’s still no offer of physically assisted guidance on the London Underground.
Ìý
Well, Caroline Pidgeon is a Lib Dem Deputy Chair of the London Assembly’s Transport Committee and she raised that issue in the Assembly session where Andy Byford was speaking there.Ìý
Ìý
Caroline, like you, we’ve been pushing for almost a couple of months now to get this sorted out.Ìý Have you had anymore luck and what do you think the stumbling blocks are?
Ìý
Pidgeon
Well, Peter, the case studies we’ve just heard just show how totally unacceptable it is that Transport for London has basically withdrawn providing physical guided assistance by their staff to people who need it.Ìý And if National Rail can provide this service, there is no reason, with the right PPE in place, why Transport for London cannot provide this service around their network.Ìý I actually first started raising this in June, when I had casework coming through to me, I was assured it would be sorted in October.Ìý We heard what the Commissioner just said and here we are today it is still not in place.
Ìý
White
Caroline Pidgeon, thank you.Ìý Do stay with us because we are now joined by Transport for London’s Chief Customer Officer, Mark Evers.Ìý
Ìý
Mark, we understand that TFL has to be mindful of staff and customer safety but why is this taking so long to sort out, after all the virus has been with us since March?
Ìý
Evers
Yeah, I can only start by apologising for the inconvenience and at times distress that people requiring physical guidance on our network have experienced at times.Ìý In order to try to do what was right and safe we heeded government advice and made some changes to the service.
Ìý
White
I should say the government have themselves said, at least a month ago, that it was okay for visually impaired people to be guided under safe circumstances.
Ìý
Evers
Well I’m very pleased to say that from Monday 23rd November physical guiding will recommence on the London Underground and Overground network.Ìý So, we will be providing disposal single use sleeves for our staff to wear, so that they are able to once again provide that really important physical assistance, so that people are able to travel independently.
Ìý
White
This is news to me, I don’t think it’s been announced yet, what’s changed your minds?
Ìý
Evers
Well it’s been really important that we’ve understood that we’ve got safe procedures in place for both our customers and for our people; that we’ve got the materials – the PPE – distributed across the 270 tube stations but really importantly, that we’ve gone and worked with our trade union colleagues and communicated to our staff how this is going to work, that it is safe and the procedures that they need to follow in order to provide a service which we absolutely recognise is vitally important to customers and why we’re so pleased that we’re back in a situation where we’ll be able to provide that from Monday.
Ìý
White
Mark, I still don’t understand why it’s taken eight months basically.
Ìý
Evers
Well for a long period of time the guidance was that it was important to maintain that two metre social distancing.Ìý It has taken us quite some time to move forward with this and again I can only apologise again for that.
Ìý
White
We’re obviously delighted that this decision has been made but I would like to explore a bit more because I think people need an explanation.Ìý We’ve been told consistently that there were debates going on with the unions.Ìý We did invite the transport union, RMT, to appear on In Touch, they preferred to send a statement.Ìý They said: “Clearly our overall priority, at the moment, has to be maintaining a covid safe environment for passengers and staff alike.Ìý However, assistance on the tube network has long been compromised by staff shortages which leaves some stations wholly unstaffed at times with no one to help those who need it.â€
Ìý
Are there staff shortages, are they right to say that it hasn’t always been possible to offer help because there aren’t enough people?
Ìý
Evers
We operate a service where we have staff at our stations through traffic hours.Ìý There may be extreme circumstances where for a short period of time a station might be unstaffed but that isn’t the normal occurrence at all.Ìý And that is one of the reasons why we are in the position to offer a turn up and go service, where a person is able to come to the station at any time and be provided with assistance by a member of staff.
Ìý
White
And there are still many blind people who, like others, have got legitimate reasons for travelling.
Ìý
Evers
Absolutely.
Ìý
White
Mark Evers, thank you very much indeed.Ìý I just want to go back, very quickly, to Lib Dem Assembly member Caroline Pidgeon.Ìý This was news to me, is it news to you?
Ìý
Pidgeon
It is news to me and of course it’s to be welcomed but how it has taken eight months for Transport for London to get to this position I think still needs to be looked into, when other train companies were able to provide the service.
Ìý
White
Well, we’re grateful to you both for coming on.Ìý We’d still like people’s views about this.Ìý Mark Evers, Caroline Pidgeon, thank you both very much indeed.
Ìý
And that’s all for this week.Ìý Next week, we’re going to be talking about Freeview’s new accessible TV guide on Channel 555, which we signposted last year.Ìý Well, it’s now here.Ìý The idea is to help you find programmes more easily.Ìý And if you’re using it already, do let us know what you make of it.
Ìý
And also next week, the campaign to save the RNIB’s large print library, which we also featured last week, at the very least for its younger users.Ìý A petition campaigning to save it has already attracted getting on for 2,000 signatures.Ìý
Ìý
You can email In Touch with your views and experiences at bbc.co.uk, you can go to our website bbc.co.uk/intouch where you can find this and other editions of the programme.Ìý From me, Peter White, producer Mike Young and studio manager John Cole, goodbye.
Broadcast
- Tue 17 Nov 2020 20:40Â鶹ԼÅÄ Radio 4
Download this programme
Listen anytime or anywhere. Subscribe to this programme or download individual episodes.
Podcast
-
In Touch
News, views and information for people who are blind or partially sighted