ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ

Ancient and ArchaeologyΒ  permalink

Was Dal Riata Irish?

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 5 of 5
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by somewhatsilly (U14315357) on Tuesday, 6th April 2010

    This comes as a result of reading the Roman -Ireland-Wales discussion. I know virtually nothing about the main thrust of the discussion apart from a few scraps such as the tradition of Irish immigration in North Wales exemplified by "Cytiau'r Gwyddelod", the local name for an Iron Age hut group near Holyhead on Anglesey but I noticed that Nordman seems to accept the mainstream account of the settlement of Argyll and the islands from Ulster.
    I'd like to hear (see) people's opinions of this paper

    I find it pretty convincing but I'm more than willing to be dissuaded by those whose knowledge is more in depth than mine. I know that it caused quite a furore when it was published and is still contentious for a variety of reasons, not all of which appear to be purely academic.

    regards

    ferval

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by an ex-nordmann - it has ceased to exist (U3472955) on Thursday, 8th April 2010

    The author of the article you link to makes a convincing case for the fact that no mass migration occurred from Ireland to Scotland at the time of the Dal Riada expansion. This is actually not something most mainstream historians would quibble with either - the model of political expansion in fact has some parallels with that of Saxon expansion in England, in that archaeology does not support a mass movement of people in a relatively short time, yet incontrovertibly produces evidence of a fundamental and rapid cultural reorientation.

    A more sanguine interpretation of what happened would, I feel, have to include the very real probability that at least the coastal areas of both land masses at this particular spot where they are within view of each other encouraged high mobility in both directions, the prevailing direction following that of political expansion, be it primarily aggressive or facilitated by cultural dominance at any given time. In that scenario the Dal Riada expansion - traditionally associated in origin with one dynasty's inability to expand in any other direction in Ireland - simply took advantage of a situation which had already long prevailed, and may even have resulted in similar expansion in the opposite direction beforehand if the philological hints are dependable enough to theorise from.

    What marked it out as different was that it coincidentally occurred at a moment in time when such expansion could be quickly consolidated.

    The Goidelic/Brittonic linguistic "split" referenced in the article is something which itself has proved unreliable in the past as something on which political division, or the boundary between political entities, can be retrospectively based, except in a very general sense. One is left still with the quandary of being unable to measure the cultural overlap which seems to have been a constant in any case, and therefore the relevance of that overlap in a political sense. There never seems to have been a "faultline" (as described in the article) which does not leave itself open to be contradicted archaeologically, or at least reveal upon examination so many exceptions as to make one wonder should the "rule" exist at all.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Wally (U14414065) on Thursday, 8th April 2010

    The terms Irish or Scottish probably meant nothing to the people of Dal Riada. Given the difference in terrain between the sixth century and now their preferred mode of transport would have been by water, and as such their view of geographical connections would be completely alien to ours.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Mr Pedant (U2464726) on Thursday, 8th April 2010

    Lots of interesting speculation about overlaps between various communities.

    I've always found the existance of Lough place names in Northumberland very perplexing.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by Haesten (U4770256) on Thursday, 8th April 2010

    ÁedÑn mac GabrÑin



    The Political Range of ÁedÑn mac GabrÑin, King of DÑl Riata (pdf)

    Report message5

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ iD

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The ΒιΆΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.