Â鶹ԼÅÄ

Ancient and Archaeology  permalink

pyramid dimensions

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 7 of 7
  • Message 1. 

    Posted by fimbar (U14054219) on Sunday, 5th July 2009

    can anyone help me with pyramid dimensions.?
    I would like to know wether the pyramid dimensions of Giza have a mathematical synchronicity with the the rest of the universe, especially the sun,

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by brushstroke (U14041781) on Wednesday, 22nd July 2009

    i dont know if they have any synchronicity with the sun or any other celestial objects but from what i have read they have very accurate dimensions ,and to me that can only conclude that there was a reason for building them that way

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Stoggler (U1647829) on Thursday, 23rd July 2009

    but from what i have read they have very accurate dimensions 

    Well of course they are very accurate if you use the Ancient Egyptians units of length!

    and to me that can only conclude that there was a reason for building them that way 

    Well of course there was a reason for building them that way - the Egyptians didn't just turn up with some stone blocks and start putting them together all willy-nilly hoping they would fit. For such an architectural project planning was involved, so of course the measurements were laid out.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by brushstroke (U14041781) on Saturday, 1st August 2009

    why are they accurate using egyptian units of length,could you explain more about egyptian units of length, and if they are so ,then what makes them not so, in our measurements

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by an ex-nordmann - it has ceased to exist (U3472955) on Sunday, 2nd August 2009

    The standard in use during the period in which the larger pyramids were constructed conformed to this scale:

    1 finger, db = 18¾ mm ≈ .72 inches
    1 palm, Å¡sp = 4 db = 75 mm ≈ 2.95 inches
    1 hand, drt = 5 db = 93¾ mm ≈ 3.7 inches
    1 fist, amm = 6 db = 112½ mm ≈4.4 inches
    1 span, spd = 12 db = 225 mm ≈ 8.86 inches
    1 foot, bw = 16 db = 300 mm ≈ 0.98 feet
    1 remen, rmn = 20 db = 375 mm ≈ 1.23 feet
    1 ordinary cubit, mh = 24 db = 6 Å¡sp = 450 mm ≈ 1.48 feet
    1 royal cubit, mh = 28 db = 7 Å¡sp = 525 mm ≈ 1.72 feet
    1 nibw = 32 db = 8 Å¡sp = 600 mm ≈ 1.97 feet
    1 double remen = 40 db = 2 rmn = 750 mm ≈ 2.46 feet
    1 rod, h3yt = 280 db = 10 mh (royal) = 5.25 m ≈ 17.22 feet
    1 ht, ht n nhw = 2800 db = 10 h3yt = 52.5 m ≈ 57.4 yards
    1 minute of march = 9800 db = 350 mh (royal) = 183.75 m ≈ 200.85 yards
    1 hour of march, atur, itrw = 588,000 db = 21,000 mh (royal) = 11.025 km ≈ 6.85 miles

    The dimensions and orientation of the pyramids vary, tremendously in the former case and significantly in the latter. Various crackpot theories attempting to relate these dimensions to other measurements (be they astronomical or geographical) tend to subvert, distort or even ignore these variations in order to prosecute a claim whose logic resides chiefly in the imagination of the prosecutor. This is unfortunate, as emphasis on spurious motivations for their construction deflects completely from the fascinating study of the actual and varied circumstances which provided a true motivation for their building, and complicate unnecessarily a true appreciation of the engineering skills and techniques employed.

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by Frank Parker (U7843825) on Sunday, 2nd August 2009

    1 minute of march = 9800 db = 350 mh (royal) = 183.75 m ≈ 200.85 yards
    1 hour of march, atur, itrw = 588,000 db = 21,000 mh (royal) = 11.025 km ≈ 6.85 miles  
    That's a pretty brisk pace. Were the ancient Egyptions particularly long legged?

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by an ex-nordmann - it has ceased to exist (U3472955) on Sunday, 2nd August 2009

    Never underestimate lentils.

    Report message7

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or  to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Â鶹ԼÅÄ iD

Â鶹ԼÅÄ navigation

Â鶹ԼÅÄ Â© 2014 The Â鶹ԼÅÄ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.