This discussion has been closed.
Posted by smurfn88 (U13987311) on Wednesday, 27th May 2009
A new book argues that the Raw Food Diet makes it nearly impossible to gain an adequate amount of energy from raw food. Furthermore, cooked food is essentially what differentiates our human selves from apes.
Hi smurfb88,
As a new poster would you confirm that you are not the author, or related to the publishers, of the new book you seek to promote? The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth now....
TP
Hi, yes I am not the author or related to the author of the book. I started a new Anthropology news blog and wanted to spread the word of not only the blog but of the intriguing article of The Cooking Hypothesis to see other scientific perspectives and responses to the article.
-SM
Hi smurfn88,
Thanks for the reply; I'm sorry to have got your designation wrong in my first post. Sorry also to seem suspicious but complete new posters who give no opinions of their own, but rather refer to a website or newly published book often turn out to be self-publicists. There are honourable exceptions of course!
The book may be new but I don't know that the concept is all that original. Undeniably fire technology was a major advance and must have made the occupation of temperate zone regions possible. The ingestion of animal protein provides far more concentrated forms of calories than foraging on fruit and vegetables, and cooking the animal must have made some rather indigestible portions digestible for the first time. On the other hand, until we started ruthlessly hunting them to extinction, large sea mammals and apes managed pretty well without barbecues.
I can't give you exact biochemical details but consuming animal protein must also make our species less vulnerable to inborn errors of metabolism that prevented the synthesis of certain amino acids and other crucial metabolic components. Although equally valuable must have been the presence of lactose in some, but not all, human groups enabling them to consume nutritious dairy products.
The thing that puzzles me about the site you linked to is this modern 'raw food diet' that the author is opposed to; I assume you are really wary of it rather than weary. I know a vegan and several vegetarians none of whom eats more raw food than I do. Indeed they go to some trouble to ensure that their diets are digestible and nutritionally adequate. Could 'raw diets' been more an American phenomenon I wonder?
TP
Beats me what this thread has to do with Ancient and Archaeology. Are you lost?
Try the Food Message boards for an answer to your question. There is a specific Vegetarian Board, they may be able to help
Hi LairigGhru & Moira,
I think the theory espoused by the original poster suggests that the cooking of food permitted various evolutionary possibilities crucial to the development of H.sapiens. This being the case I think that posting on A & A was reasonable.
Having said that I do find it very disappointing for new posters to post on one issue only, not give their own personal opinions, and never follow up replies. It does make me wonder what their motivation might be.
TP
Don't feed the troll!
The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.
or Β to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
The message board is closed for posting.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.