Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΒ  permalink

Germany In Africa in World War 1

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 7 of 7
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by Dr Antonias Fuccilio (U14405367) on Thursday, 24th March 2011

    I have read the superb tip and run ,which is about the first world war in German East Africa ,and how a small group of German colonial soldiers farmers ,and a few German naval officers .
    How they would have performed if ,by chance the Kaiser had sent severall hundred soldiers to East Africa for his birthday celebrations ,would extra europen trained soldiers ,have turned the tide towards Germany ,and maybe instead of defence ,germany could have invaded .

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Sambista (U4068266) on Thursday, 24th March 2011

    The Great War in Africa is a fascinating and little known story. I doubt if a small reinforcement would have made much difference, other than requiring corresponding reinforcement by quality Empire troops - perhaps Indian Army.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Dr Antonias Fuccilio (U14405367) on Friday, 25th March 2011

    I think the inclusions of just a few hundred german soldiers ,with modern guns/and a few good artilly pieces way well have stopped the commenwelth troops .
    I have explored the fact german soldiers worked closely with ottoman turkish soldiers ,maybe a large turkish force landing in north africa may well have stired up local rebbelions

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by GrandFalconRailroad (U14802912) on Friday, 25th March 2011

    I think the inclusions of just a few hundred german soldiers ,with modern guns/and a few good artilly pieces way well have stopped the commenwelth troops .
    I have explored the fact german soldiers worked closely with ottoman turkish soldiers ,maybe a large turkish force landing in north africa may well have stired up local rebbelions Β 
    To advance forward to 1941 - what might have happended if the Germans had sent more aircraft to Iraq to support the uprising?

    Equally if the Germans and Japanese in 1941 had decided to operate in the Bay of Bengal together to attack troops being brought toward India to support operations in Arakan?

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by White Camry (U2321601) on Friday, 25th March 2011

    Dr Antonias Fuccilio:

    I have read the superb tip and run ,which is about the first world war in German East Africa ,and how a small group of German colonial soldiers farmers ,and a few German naval officers .
    How they would have performed if ,by chance the Kaiser had sent severall hundred soldiers to East Africa for his birthday celebrations ,would extra europen trained soldiers ,have turned the tide towards Germany ,and maybe instead of defence ,germany could have invaded Β 


    Logisitcs aside - how would they have been fed, armed and supplied? - that many more German troops sent to Africa would have raised no small number of red flags in the local British colonies which would have raised red flags in the Colonial Office which would have led to an equivalent contingent of British soldiers and an extra cruiser or two sent to Africa. In short, the pre-war arms race would simply have opened a branch office in southern Africa.

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by Dr Antonias Fuccilio (U14405367) on Friday, 25th March 2011

    I think the british colonial office had no idea ,or scale of what the germans in east africa could do, what the germans with help from local tribes farmers and ex retierd german officers ,managed to hold up almost 250-300 .000 british and commenwelth troops .
    What the british just couldnt do was adapt ,and this made german attacks quick small very effective .
    I think and still belive just a few more europen soldiers /ottoman soldiers may well have turned the tide for germany in africa

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by giraffe47 (U4048491) on Friday, 25th March 2011

    I suspect it may have had the opposite effect.

    More European soldiers, the less innovation and flexibility, which was what kept the Germans going for so long. Conventional armies might have fought a more conventional campaign - the Germans 'lost' the war there long ago, but just kept going, and refused to quit.

    The Boer war was similar - the Boers lost the 'conventional' war quite quickly, but kept going, tying down even more troops, long after their cause was lost.

    Report message7

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.