Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΜύ permalink

Black Hawk Down

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 13 of 13
  • Message 1.Μύ

    Posted by vesturiiis (U13688567) on Friday, 26th March 2010

    Just saw a documentary on this incredible story and felt in awe of my neighbours to the South as they often take a lot of heat military wise.
    But don't understant why Clinton etc... were so quick to pull out and negate the whole effort. I think Somalia for years after was a complete mess as a country.

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Vizzer aka U_numbers (U2011621) on Wednesday, 31st March 2010

    Didn't the Clinton administration see Somalia as George Bush's war. It was widely felt (rightly or wrongly) at the time that outgoing President Bush had ordered the invasion as a spiteful 'welcome-to-the-Oval-Office' gift to the then President-Elect Clinton.

    During the election campaign Bush had gambled all on his foreign policy record (particularly his successful and hugely popular prosecution of the Kuwait War). But that war had ended 21 months before election day and was no longer uppermost in the minds of the electorate. Clinton on the other hand had struck a seam of public opinion when he had promised to 'focus like a laser beam' on the domestic economy. He had even famously taunted Bush - "It's the economy, stupid."

    The invasion took place on 5 December 1992 four weeks after the presidential election and seven weeks before Clinton's inauguration. It's not surprising, therefore, that the new administration in Washington was less than enthusiastic about the Somalia intervention.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by TimTrack (U1730472) on Thursday, 1st April 2010

    "...Didn't the Clinton administration see Somalia as George Bush's war. It was widely felt (rightly or wrongly) at the time that outgoing President Bush had ordered the invasion as a spiteful 'welcome-to-the-Oval-Office' gift to the then President-Elect Clinton..."




    The perception might have existed in some quarters, but Bush senior would not, in my opinion, stoop that low.




    "....During the election campaign Bush had gambled all on his foreign policy record (particularly his successful and hugely popular prosecution of the Kuwait War). But that war had ended 21 months before election day and was no longer uppermost in the minds of the electorate..."



    In the US they have, I believe, a saying : 'It is the economy, stupid', ie, people vote for their wallets, not freedom in Kuwait, Panama, or anywhere else. If Bush senior forgot that, or had no electoral leg to stand on in this regard, that is why he lost.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by suvorovetz (U12273591) on Thursday, 1st April 2010

    If Bush senior forgot that, or had no electoral leg to stand on in this regard, that is why he lost.Μύ Bush senior lost for one obvious reason: 'Read my lips - no new taxes' pledge that he violated during his term. Some of his Republican base defected to the spoiler Perot, and Clinton was elected with pretty low 43 percent of the vote, as I recall.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by White Camry (U2321601) on Friday, 2nd April 2010

    suvorovetz

    Bush senior lost for one obvious reason: 'Read my lips - no new taxes' pledge that he violated during his term. Some of his Republican base defected to the spoiler Perot, and Clinton was elected with pretty low 43 percent of the vote, as I recall. Μύ

    You recall correctly.



    There was yet another factor. The Baby Boomers were coming of governing age while the WW2 generation was heading for the retirement homes, if not for the grave. However, the GOP didn't get that message in time for the '96 election when Clinton won again by a bigger margin.

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Wally (U14414065) on Friday, 16th April 2010

    But don't understant why Clinton etc... were so quick to pull out and negate the whole effort. I think Somalia for years after was a complete mess as a country.Μύ

    Clinton was pressurised by the Republicans to pull out, in fact he stayed much longer than they wished him to. This is an interview he gave to Fox News where he was ambushed on this very subject.



    The relevant part starts at 4.15 on the video.

    There is also a Part 2 to this video both are worth watching as Historical Documents.

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by stalti (U14278018) on Friday, 16th April 2010

    i think you will find that the reality of black hawk down is different to the film

    far from being a somali version of the alamo - the attackers were the ones who were the underdogs

    st

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by shivfan (U2435266) on Tuesday, 20th April 2010

    My Somali friends tell me that the movie 'Black Hawk Down' was one of the biggest pieces of fiction they have ever seen come out of Hollywood....

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 8.

    Posted by vesturiiis (U13688567) on Tuesday, 20th April 2010

    Hi Shiv...

    Not sure what part of Black Hawk Down the movie was so much fiction, seeing the documentary and listening to the real soldiers they did not mention any problem that way.
    Hollywood of course can take some irritating liberties but in this case it seemed to be quite close to the actual event.

    thanks IAN

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 9.

    Posted by tucuxii (U13714114) on Wednesday, 21st April 2010

    felt in awe of my neighbours to the South as they often take a lot of heat military wise.
    Μύ


    Are you an Afghan - it was the Pakistanis who rescued the Americans from the mess they got themselves into.

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by vesturiiis (U13688567) on Wednesday, 21st April 2010

    As for me being an Afhgan
    I guess it is possible, Erik the Red did cover a lot of territory in his time.
    To say the Pakistanis bailed out the Americans is a bit of a stretch. They were slow as molassas getting to the site and then buggered off leaving a batch of soldiers to RUN their way out of danger.
    Not the greatest rescue misson of all time; I'll stick with the believe that the USA troops were incredibly ballsy during this misson that went awry.

    thanks IAN

    Report message11

  • Message 12

    , in reply to message 8.

    Posted by Wally (U14414065) on Thursday, 22nd April 2010

    My Somali friends tell me that the movie 'Black Hawk Down' was one of the biggest pieces of fiction they have ever seen come out of Hollywood....Μύ

    I find this criticism of a commercial motion picture designed to entertain and make money odd. If you want historical correctness read a book, or watch a documentary. Depending from which side the author of the book, or director of the documentary is from you will most likely still get a biased version. Try to remember that the book the film was based on was from the USA and although the Director was British, he chose the book for it's narrative and not for it's historical accuracy.

    The film could have been much worse, and although Scott changed the ending because he though it was too mundane (Remember he is out to make money) the film does not do the usual Hollywood trick of completely changing history. The Americans are shown in an unflattering light in that they are outsmarted and outmanoeuvred by Mohamed Farrah Aidid. The main criticism of the film is that the Somali people are depicted as two dimensional and the part in the rescue by Malaysian and Pakistani troops was underplayed.

    Report message12

  • Message 13

    , in reply to message 12.

    Posted by stalti (U14278018) on Thursday, 22nd April 2010

    the trapped soldiers - well equipped and armed were covered all night by helicopter gunships leading to hundreds of somali casualties and were rescued by a 2 mile convoy of armour and apcs - malaysians and pakistanis were heavily involved

    the somalis were armed with only ak47s and rpgs

    the film was fantastic - the courage of the us troops was immense

    but if the air cover was removed it would have been a different story

    st

    Report message13

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Μύto take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.