Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΒ  permalink

Honourable Nazis?

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 5 of 5
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by Parti-NG-ton Blue (U13898629) on Tuesday, 21st April 2009

    I have just finished reading an article about Erwin Rommel and even though he was a Nazi General he seems to be a decent man and a "Gentleman" soldier of old school values.

    Is this a generally accepted view of Rommel and if so are there many others that are regarding in a favourable light?

    Regards

    Peter

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by MattJ18 (U13798409) on Tuesday, 21st April 2009

    That's the popular view of Rommel I'd say. He's helped by the fact that he did only fought in the West and was killed/committed suicide in the end when he tried became involved in the Hitler assasination plot. He's certainly portrayed fairly decently in British war films...

    Most other German are tainted by their actions on the Eastern front. Von Manstein for example seems a professional soldier of the old school, but he was complicit in the killing of Jews and others in Russia.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Parti-NG-ton Blue (U13898629) on Tuesday, 21st April 2009

    Wasn't Rommel given the option (or so I'm led to believe) of killing himself and being declared a hero or being shot and declared a traitor?

    I always thought that the Rommel link to the assassination on Hitler was just "convenient" to Hitler when wanting to be rid of Rommel.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Mikestone8 (U13249270) on Tuesday, 21st April 2009

    Wasn't Rommel given the option (or so I'm led to believe) of killing himself and being declared a hero or being shot and declared a traitor?Β 


    Yes. He chose the former because the latter would have meant retribution on his wife and son as well as himself.



    I always thought that the Rommel link to the assassination on Hitler was just "convenient" to Hitler when wanting to be rid of Rommel.?Β 

    Without that connection Hitler had no reason to want to get rid of Rommel.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Mani (U1821129) on Wednesday, 22nd April 2009

    JWB1865


    He was never a member of the Nazi party, so not a 'Nazi General'.

    His actions were certainly consitent with his reputation.

    He refused to kill jewish POW's out of hand. He refused Hitler's 'Commando order'.

    Also, he wasn't involved in the Assasination plot against Hitler, he was just aware of it but didn't spill the beans.

    Report message5

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.