Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΒ  permalink

What was 2nd best but rather good re: military kit?

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 2 of 2
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by Grand Falcon Railroad (U3267675) on Friday, 10th March 2006

    What was considered in the area of warfare second best but turned out to be rather good? (This is an expansion on the forgotten heroes post so I'm not looking foir the same answers BTW).

    For example the original P-51 Mustang was a bit of a failiure by all accounts - the good gents of Rolls-Royce fettle a Merlin engine into it and hey presto we've got a winner on our hands.

    Might I also suggest the Handley Page Victor - we might not have had the Russians to bomb anymore but let some blokes put a big tank of fuel in the back and we've got a rather effective AAR aircraft - same thing in principle with the Nimrod (adapted after Comet failiure) and VC-10 (not bad as an airliner but pretty fine as a RAF AAR tanker).

    Any suggestions?

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Grumpyfred (U2228930) on Friday, 10th March 2006

    Short Stirling. Built as the U Ks first heavy, but (I can hear the treasury here) Built so that it fitted existing R A F hangers. So the wings were too short. Did not have the hight or range of the Lanc, or the Halifax, but after doing its job well as a bomber, went on to serve well as a glider tug

    Report message2

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.