Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΒ  permalink

Malaysia ___Vietnam

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 6 of 6
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by aapottsy (U2328780) on Wednesday, 1st March 2006

    What is the difference between the UK crushing the communist insurgency in Malaysia and Vietnam!

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by FormerlyOldHermit (U3291242) on Wednesday, 1st March 2006

    We won perhaps? A similiarity is that it shaped Britain and US's anti insurgency operations and philosophies to this day.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by aapottsy (U2328780) on Wednesday, 1st March 2006

    Okay.

    It was fought for many years.

    It was won, but when?

    Why were Australian soldiers needed to fight the war?

    We (British and Australians) were good at jungle insurgency.

    Does that justify it??

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Lyceum2 (U1941441) on Wednesday, 1st March 2006

    The main reasons for the British success in Malaya in relation to the US's in Vietnam is the different types of insurgency and the different position of the two aforementioned. The Viet Cong benefited from a strong backing from the Vietnamese people, caused by the Americans being portrayed as foreign invaders and the popularity of Communism within the huge rural population. In Malaya, however, the CT did not have the same backing from the population. One reason for this was the ethnic tensions in Malaya, the CT being predominantly composed of the Chinese minority; this was coupled with the Malayan prosperity under British imperial rule.

    The British at this time were accepted by the majority of the population, no one social strata contained a substantial opposition to British rule, the main rubber farms and tin mines, the primary source of economic activity in Malaya, was controlled by British businessmen and Britain had a tight control of the Malaya administration. The American only had superfluous relations with Vietnam before the conflict and there was a strong opposition from the people of Vietnam against US military and economic involvement. As you can see, they were two very different circumstances.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by wollemi (U2318584) on Wednesday, 1st March 2006

    The main reasons for the British success in Malaya in relation to the US's in Vietnam is the different types of insurgency and the different position of the two aforementioned. The Viet Cong benefited from a strong backing from the Vietnamese people, caused by the Americans being portrayed as foreign invaders and the popularity of Communism within the huge rural population. In Malaya, however, the CT did not have the same backing from the population. One reason for this was the ethnic tensions in Malaya, the CT being predominantly composed of the Chinese minority; this was coupled with the Malayan prosperity under British imperial rule.

    The British at this time were accepted by the majority of the population, no one social strata contained a substantial opposition to British rule, the main rubber farms and tin mines, the primary source of economic activity in Malaya, was controlled by British businessmen and Britain had a tight control of the Malaya administration. The American only had superfluous relations with Vietnam before the conflict and there was a strong opposition from the people of Vietnam against US military and economic involvement. As you can see, they were two very different circumstances. Β 


    Yes

    I think also Malaya operated more as a domestic civil conflict, Vietnam had the addition of an international Cold War focus, fears of the 'domino effect', support from China, spread into IndoChina.

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by Lyceum2 (U1941441) on Thursday, 2nd March 2006

    Indeed Wollemi, good point, a very influential factor!

    Report message6

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.