Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΒ  permalink

Merchant Navy at war.

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 14 of 14
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by Dirk Marinus (U1648073) on Monday, 13th February 2006

    The next time you visit search engine Google type in:

    www.lascars.co.uk/war.html

    you can read some intersting stories about the Merchant Navy at war.

    Make certain you don't forget the letters html after the word war in URL

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by PaulRyckier (U1753522) on Monday, 13th February 2006

    Re: Message 1.

    Dirk,

    yes interesting:

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by PaulRyckier (U1753522) on Monday, 13th February 2006

    re: Message 1.

    Excuse me Dirk,

    I pressed instead of the Preview to see if the Http:// was right, direct: Post message.

    Warm regards,

    Paul.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by stalteriisok (U3212540) on Thursday, 16th February 2006

    Was joining the MN an alternative (orpart of) to conscrption - ie could u join it instead of the forces (not knocking it as it was certainly as dangerous)

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by MB (U177470) on Thursday, 16th February 2006

    The next time you visit search engine Google type in:

    www.lascars.co.uk/war.html

    you can read some intersting stories about the Merchant Navy at war.

    Make certain you don't forget the letters html after the word war in URLΒ 



    I don't understand why there is a reference to GOOGLE. You just type or paste the URL into your browser no need to involve GOOGLE.

    MB

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by U1969296 (U1969296) on Friday, 17th February 2006

    Hi Dirk
    My wife's uncle (who died last year)was in the M.N
    Was torpedoed in 1940 got picked up and landed in Liverpool and three months later was torpedoed again in the North Atlantic got picked up by a German ship and spent the rest of the war in a camp near the Polish border. He was very reluctant to talk about his experience's, but according to his wife he was a different person when he came home very agitated and very moody a great shame and very sad The next time you visit search engine Google type in:

    www.lascars.co.uk/war.html

    you can read some intersting stories about the Merchant Navy at war.

    Make certain you don't forget the letters html after the word war in URLΒ 

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by Grumpyfred (U2228930) on Friday, 17th February 2006

    To my knowledge, the M N was pure volunteers. Did you know that if their ship was hit, and the crew went over the side, the minute their feet hit the water, they came off pay. The ship owners got a brand new ship from HMG, but the sailor got nothing. You had ship owners sending old ships to sea hoping that they where sank. Putting ships into fast convoys, knowing that their would never be able to keep up, and stood a good chance of being picked off. Surely that was murder.
    Fred

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by OUNUPA (U2078829) on Sunday, 19th February 2006

    Thanks for your tip,Dirk.
    Dirk,before the WWII war started a massive shipbuilding program had been undertaken in USA.It established the right of the US gov. to requisition ships and to adopt as naval auxiliaries commercial vessels which had been buit with gov. subsidies(Merchant Marine Acts of 1920 and 1936).
    Between 1941 and 1945 more than 5,500 merchant ships were constracted to support US' wartime operations,of which some 4,500 were general cargo vessels.
    Sir W.Churchill once remarked,'It is the vehicles that take the shipping space out of all proportion to the other needs of the fighting men'.

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by stalteriisok (U3212540) on Sunday, 19th February 2006

    To my knowledge, the M N was pure volunteers. Did you know that if their ship was hit, and the crew went over the side, the minute their feet hit the water, they came off pay. The ship owners got a brand new ship from HMG, but the sailor got nothing. You had ship owners sending old ships to sea hoping that they where sank. Putting ships into fast convoys, knowing that their would never be able to keep up, and stood a good chance of being picked off. Surely that was murder.
    Fred Β 


    That is UNBELIEVABLE !!!! so - if they were marooned for x days, and picked up , they wouldnt be paid till their next ship !! (and charged for loss of uniform etc !! - any strikes over this they would be commie b-----ds !!

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 9.

    Posted by Grumpyfred (U2228930) on Sunday, 19th February 2006

    Makes you wonder after treatment like that, why they ever volunteered to go back to sea. But if they didn't, they would have had their pay books marked as Unsuitable, and would because of the Network of Ship Owners, never have worked again. I was also told that sailors coming in from the likes of the U S during the war were searched and most of the food they brought in for their families was taken off them by H. M. Customs. The same with people travelling back from Ireland.
    Bed Time.
    Fred

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by Grumpyfred (U2228930) on Monday, 20th February 2006

    Something else you find interesting. The Board of Trade Life Jacket was lethal. It was designed for people already in the life boats. IF you jumped over the side feet first, there was a bloody good chance that the life belt would break your neck as it hit the water. The force of the water would push the belt upwards striking your chin and bingo. one broken neck

    Report message11

  • Message 12

    , in reply to message 11.

    Posted by stalteriisok (U3212540) on Tuesday, 21st February 2006

    if they refused to go back to sea - would they have then been liable for conscription ??

    Report message12

  • Message 13

    , in reply to message 12.

    Posted by Grumpyfred (U2228930) on Tuesday, 21st February 2006

    I would think so, but I would be guessing. But the chances of them ever going to sea again after the war would be nil.
    Fred

    Report message13

  • Message 14

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by stalteriisok (U3212540) on Tuesday, 21st February 2006

    amazing facts u have listed - digressing - but its a bit like the strike at bettshanger pit - u have no sympathy for the strikers and think of them as traitors until u realise the scam of the mine owners and how they made money out of the war

    Report message14

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.