Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Wars and ConflictsΜύ permalink

The Korean War

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 11 of 11
  • Message 1.Μύ

    Posted by naylingroad (U2216766) on Tuesday, 25th October 2005

    Why is the Korean War ignored in your list of wars? It started with the invasion of South Korea by the communist sponsored North Korea on 25th June 1950 in contravention of the United Naations. There was s cease fire which came into force at 10p.m. local time on 27th July 1953. The spread of communism stopped at the 38th parallel. It is called "The Forgotten War"
    The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ have certainly forgotten it and the part that 55,000 British troops played in it together with many Commonwealth troops and some European troops, notably French and Dutch and Luxemberg.
    Perhaps you will correct this omission soon.

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by PaulRyckier (U1753522) on Tuesday, 25th October 2005

    Re: Message 1.

    Naylingroad,

    I was and still am very interested in the Korean War and saw I thought a good Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ? documentary about it, years ago. I mentioned it already several times on these boards, but wasn't sure if it wasn't from Channel 4. So I decided today to do the ultime research and found it.

    Google: trumedia dvd bbc documentary history korean war. And there it is: Nearly 20Β£ that's not cheap. And I am not even sure if it is this one I saw, while I didn't find in one hour research no references to it. But in the meantime I found some interesting survey from the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ on internet. Some half an hour read.

    And BTW, You mentioned the Dutch and those from Luxemburg, but you forgot my Belgian compatriots (big smile). I knew some veteran, but he is dead now. Natural cause in his bed in Belgium.

    And Mac Arthur who wanted to get nuclear and had to be stopped by his president...

    Kind regards and welcome to the boards.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Mark E (U204575) on Wednesday, 26th October 2005

    Hi Naylingroad
    You can't have looked too hard! Take a look here


    Which includes a link to an article about the Korean war called - you guessed it - The forgotten War.

    There is also an article about American forces' conduct during the war.
    Cheers, Mark

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by PaulRyckier (U1753522) on Wednesday, 26th October 2005

    Re: Message 3.

    Mark, my old (veteran? Or has "old" in this context the same value as in Dutch? Hence you can have a young old friend?) friend,

    If I click on your name I see a lot of messages in the 6 latest hours. Happy that you are around again...some three weeks ago?...

    Warm regards,

    your friend Paul.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by Mark E (U204575) on Thursday, 27th October 2005

    Hi Paul
    Nice to 'see' you again. Feeling old today after one too many drinks last night smiley - winkeye

    I get on here when I can, send a flurry of posts then disappear again...
    Hope to see you around, Mark

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Erik Lindsay (U231725) on Thursday, 27th October 2005

    Why is the Korean War ignored in your list of wars? It started with the invasion of South Korea by the communist sponsored North Korea on 25th June 1950 in contravention of the United Naations. There was s cease fire which came into force at 10p.m. local time on 27th July 1953. The spread of communism stopped at the 38th parallel. It is called "The Forgotten War"
    The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ have certainly forgotten it and the part that 55,000 British troops played in it together with many Commonwealth troops and some European troops, notably French and Dutch and Luxemberg.
    Perhaps you will correct this omission soon.
    Μύ


    Forgetting the Korean war seems to be an habitual thing with everyone, especially the Americans and particularly the US gov't and press. The US veterans were ignored when they returned and the war, its cause and aftermath, is generally ignored even today. Much is made of the Vietnam vets who fought a war that was a good deal less justified than the Korean War and yet the latter produced nearly as many casualties in its 3 years as Vietnam did in 10, and its results were far more satisfactory than the Vietnam conflict's were. I still wonder why it's brushed off so casually by historians. There's many a comment been made that WW2 was the last 'good' war, which I presume means that it was the last one being fought by the 'good guys' against the 'bad guys'. Most Korean vets, including me, resent that but no one seems to care.

    As for the combatants, don't forget the Canadians. We were there in considerable numbers, considering the country's population -- and then there were the Turks. Not Europeans, but they were there. I fought alongside a company of them at one point and they were an interesting group. They were certainly sincere in their determination to kill the enemy. There are stories that they would often sneak off individually at night and commit some quiet butchery in the Chinese lines before they returned and I was told the Chinese were scared to death of them. I can't vouch for the accuracy of those stories, but their men carried long, very sharp knives as part of their equipment, and having spoken with a few of their officers, I wouldn't doubt it.

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by expat32 (U2025313) on Thursday, 27th October 2005

    I think you don't hear much about it because it was not a big war (unless you were in it) and coming fairly soon after WW2 I figure folks just had enough of war. Also there was no big final ending that brought celebration.

    In talking to our veterans the thing that strikes me is the respect they have for the Turkish soldier. Evidently the North Koreans and Chinese wanted nothing to do with them. It was described to me that when they hit the U.N.lines, they acted like a fast moving stream hitting a huge rock.
    They would go around rather than take on the Turks head on.

    When you remember their performance at Gallipoli it may be easier to understand. The Turks of course are Muslims, Given the mid east situation, something we should remember perhaps.

    Cheers

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by TonyG (U1830405) on Thursday, 27th October 2005

    I think you don't hear much about it because it was not a big war (unless you were in it) and coming fairly soon after WW2 I figure folks just had enough of war. Also there was no big final ending that brought celebration.

    Μύ


    Spot on. I also think that Vietnam took over as it was the first real Television War, beamed into millions of homes in Europe and America.

    For many, the only knowledge of the Korean War is what they learned from "MASH", although I expect many viewers think it was set in Vietnam.

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 8.

    Posted by Mark E (U204575) on Friday, 28th October 2005

    For many, the only knowledge of the Korean War is what they learned from "MASH", although I expect many viewers think it was set in Vietnam.Μύ
    M*A*S*H what a great series that was. Set in Korea it may have been, but it was about Vietnam, I think

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 9.

    Posted by TonyG (U1830405) on Friday, 28th October 2005

    For many, the only knowledge of the Korean War is what they learned from "MASH", although I expect many viewers think it was set in Vietnam.Μύ
    M*A*S*H what a great series that was. Set in Korea it may have been, but it was about Vietnam, I thinkΜύ


    It was based on Richard Hooker's books and he was a doctor in Korea. (He used a nom de plume and I can't remember his real name). However, I suspect you are correct in that, like most TV programmes & films, the scripts were heavily influenced by what was going on at the time they were making the programme, which was, of course, Vietnam.

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by PaulRyckier (U1753522) on Saturday, 29th October 2005

    Re: Message 5.

    Mark,

    thank you for your "heartwarming" reply. Yes, and I get on here when I can too.

    All the best,

    Paul.

    Report message11

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Μύto take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.