This discussion has been closed.
Posted by 141291 (U1414799) on Friday, 26th August 2005
Spike, yesterday, you found the marriage between my grt grt grandparents, ive been trying to find , what you found, but i cant. Please can you tell me where you found this out and the reference numbers of the pages or GRO index
Many Thanks
141291
Spike, iv found amrraige between Jane Little and Edward Lee, in Behernal Green in Mar 1/4 1882, could this be it?
141291
Hi 141291,
I found the marriage on the England and Wales Civil Registration Index 1837 - 1983.
Vol 1a page 497 and the details are as follows:
Charles Edward Lee married a Sarah Jane Little
December 1/4 1891 in Fulham.
I went for this marriage as it gave both parties names in full on page 497.
Did you pick up Beatrice Lee's date of birth on an earlier message?
Hi Tom,
Just been reading through the postings for your search for Beatrice Lee... I agree with Spike, I think you may have her date of birth wrong, by 10 years in fact as I've found the complete family on 1901 census.
Residence:
66 Leslie Rd, Leyton, Walthamstow, Essex
Charles E Lee head mar 31 butchers clerk
born Stepney, London
Sarah J Lee wife mar 34 born: Portland Dorset
Edward Lee age 12 born:Forest Hill Kent
Beathrice Lee age 8 born Kennington, London
Source information: RG13/1622
Registration district: West Ham
Sub District: South Leyton
ED: 24 Folio: 114 Page: 15 Household sched: 99
Also, I aways look to see who the neighbours were and guess who I foundat No 68... possibly Beatrice's future husband - William Richards and his family:
Frederick Richards head mar 45 Mantle Salesman
born: London Hackney
Annie L Richards wife mar 40 born: Brixton
Grace H " dau age 13 born Mile End
Hildra N " dau age 11 born "
Sidney F " son age 10 born "
Wlliam H " son age 8 born Leyton Essex Ethel RS " dau age 11mths born Leyton Essex
Hope this helps you on your way. I also think the marriage certificate Spike found for Beatrice's parents is correct
Thanks, i found beatrice yesterday, you were right, she was 10 years younger.
That william richards is'nt him
Many Thanks 141291
The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.
or Β to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
The message board is closed for posting.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.