Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Family TreesΒ  permalink

Arthur Brooks b.1878 Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 20 of 20
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Saturday, 29th October 2011

    A story told to me by my grandmother was that before WWII her mother received a letter from "Uncle........" who was living in America telling her that the family had all better move over to America because Hitler was going to win the war !! Word is that she cut-off all contact with him in disgust.

    Over the years I have tried to track down who this person was and, at the moment, I am concentrating on Arthur Brooks, b. 1878 in Whaley Bridge, Derbyshire. He was her husband's half-brother.

    I have looked on Any on the American 1930 census but don't have a sub to look at the details. Could I ask if sks with a sub could have a look for me. I see there are 10 Arthur Brooks of that d.o.b but, of couse, he may not be any of them !!

    I believe he must've returned to England at sometime as I think I have tracked down his death in Derbyshire.

    Gnats

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Windsurfing_Widow (U14179138) on Saturday, 29th October 2011

    I can see 11 Arthur Brooks born between 1877 and 1879 on 1930 USA census but only one of them born in England. He is Arthur J Brooks, living in Atlas, Genesee, Michigan, aged 53, single, a farm labourer, immigrated to USA in 1895.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Mabel Bagshawe (U2222589) on Saturday, 29th October 2011

    That one on the US census may not be him as he appears to be here in 1911

    Name: Arthur Brooks
    Event: Census
    Event Date: 1911
    Gender: Male
    Age: 33
    Birthplace: Whaley Bridge, Cheshire
    Record Type: Household
    Registration District: Chapel En Le Frith
    Sub-district: Chapel En Le Frith
    Parish: Chapel En Le Frith
    County: Derbyshire

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Saturday, 29th October 2011

    Hi W-W and Mabel

    Thanks for looking - the Arthur Brooks you found on the US Census is not the right one. I believe he would not have left England until after 1913, when his father died (who I think was living with Arthur and his wife at the time).

    Mabel, the Arthur you have on the 1911 is the correct one - that is the latest information I have on him. I have tried looking on passenger lists but the name is not uncommon. From what my Grandmother told me, the letter which was written to her mother caused quite a commotion !

    Thank you for taking the time to look.

    Gnats

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Saturday, 29th October 2011

    I don't quite understand when you say there is nothing else on Arthur Brooks... you have him on 1911, then a likely death in England.

    He may not have married so there wouldn't be much else online ater 1911.

    Is it likely a half brother writing to his sister-in-law and not his brother?


    Is there anyone else in the frame?

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    I don't quite understand when you say there is nothing else on Arthur Brooks... you have him on 1911, then a likely death in England.

    He may not have married so there wouldn't be much else online ater 1911.

    Is it likely a half brother writing to his sister-in-law and not his brother?


    Is there anyone else in the frame?Β 
    JC - I apologise, I didn't intend to imply that the half-brother had written the letter solely to his sister-in-law - I would've thought it would have been to the family - its just that she was the one who took exception to its contents.

    On the 1911 AB is already married (8 years) to Ann. His father is living with them but dies a couple of years later (I wondered if this was the time which prompted them to move, if it is them). There don't appear to be any children.

    I know nothing more about him AFTER the 1911 other than having found his death in Chinley, Derbyhire in 1952 (nothing in between). I don't remember him being talked about by my Gran.

    It may well be that this isn't the man who sent the letter. I know it wasn't the g.grandmother's brother as he was still living in the area and spoken about often.

    Its a little difficult to convey when trying to unravel "stories".

    Thanks for input anyway.

    Gnats

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    I couldn't see a return passage for him or an entry into the us.

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    Thanks - I'll have to have another look and see what other possibilities there might be.

    Gnats

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    If he was born 22 aug 1878, I think I might have found him

    There is a ww1 draft registration card for him on ancestry. Wife, Anne, living at Rochelle Park, Bergen, New Jersey. Worked as an operator for British American Chemical co. The card is dated 12 sept 1918

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 9.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    ok, so the above Arthur Brooks arrived:

    Name: Arthur Brooks
    Arrival Date: 6 Jun 1913
    Birth Year: abt 1879
    Age: 34
    Gender: Male
    Port of Departure: Liverpool, England
    Port of Arrival: New York, New York
    Ship Name: Mauretania

    according to the passenger list his wife anna was age 38
    children
    Margaret 6
    Donald W 1
    Philip 2
    heading for Rochelle Park New Jersey

    says the husband had been naturalised in 1908

    sounds like they travelled a bit and there is probably more crossings

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    this is possibly him arriving back in New York again
    Name: Arthur Brooks
    Arrival Date: 4 May 1911
    Birth Year: abt 1879
    Age: 32
    Gender: Male
    Port of Departure: Liverpool, England
    Port of Arrival: New York, New York
    Ship Name: Caronia


    says he is married and a US ciitizen, which he would be if he was naturalized in 1909. Occupation is down as a Dyer. no address given

    Report message11

  • Message 12

    , in reply to message 11.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    1930
    rochell Park NJ
    Anne Brooks 54 widowed says arrived in USA 1904, nationality Serbian?
    Margaret Brooks 23
    Donald Brooks 20
    Arthur P Brooks 18
    all children born New Jersey

    1920
    Mildand Park, Bergen, NJ
    Anne Brooks 44 widowed
    Margaret Brooks 13
    Donald W Brooks 10
    Arthur P Brooks 8
    arrived USA 1904, naturalised 1906
    rather strangely, Ann doesn't have an occupation, no one works in the household!

    maybe arthur abandoned his family in america and came back to England

    Report message12

  • Message 13

    , in reply to message 11.

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    JC - that looks very promising, the only thing is that on the 1911 they have been married 8 years and have no children. Ann was three years older than him, and he was working in the local bleachworks - which makes the occupation of "dyer" interesting - hmmmmm.

    Thank you.

    Gnats


    Report message13

  • Message 14

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    Thanks Gnats, I can't see the 1911 census to find out his occupation

    it certainly looks like the right family, perhaps they adopted the Margaret and had Philip and Donald in America

    Can't see why she says she was born Serbia? Is there a marriage in England for Arthur?

    Report message14

  • Message 15

    , in reply to message 14.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    1910 US census
    Name: Arthur Brooks
    Age in 1910: 31
    Estimated Birth Year: 1879
    Birthplace: England
    Relation to Head of House: Head
    Father's Birth Place: England
    Mother's Birth Place: England
    Spouse's Name: Anne Brooks
    Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ in 1910: Midland, Bergen, New Jersey
    Marital Status: Married
    Race: White
    Gender: Male
    Year of immigration: 1890
    Neighbors: View others on page
    Household Members: Name Age
    Arthur Brooks 31 Feather Dyer
    Anne Brooks 34
    Magret Brooks 3
    Donald W Brooks 10/12
    [0]
    Mary Warne 31 sister single born England

    do you think they left the children in america when they came back visiting in 1911 and easier to say they had no children than saying they left them in America

    says married 4 years, 3 children/ 2 living
    this census says Arthur went to USA 1890 and Ann came from Turkey

    following this family doesn't add up... it certainly looks like the right family but somethings are not quite right

    Report message15

  • Message 16

    , in reply to message 15.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    Arthur isn't on the 1900 census so 1910 details are a little suspect

    Report message16

  • Message 17

    , in reply to message 15.

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    JC - I agree that this family don't add-up, the names are good - Arthur Brooks married an Ann Hill who was also born in Whaley Bridge, but this makes the Serbian/Turkish connection wrong.

    Also, on the 1911 he is working in Whaley Bridge - unless he can't make his mind up whether to stay or go - perhaps came back 'cos his Dad was ageing?

    I was very hopeful when I saw him travelling alone (sorry Ann ! - lol) but I think I may have to start getting a couple of certs - mainly the death one to confirm that he did actually die here (if only check the notifier of death to confirm the link).

    Thanks for you help in this - it is making it very interesting.

    Gnats

    Report message17

  • Message 18

    , in reply to message 15.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    there are a few trees on ancestry with this family but they have Arthur coming from Camberwell ?

    That might need checking out as I've found many of the american trees just picking any ancestor that looks like they might fit just because they have the same name

    Report message18

  • Message 19

    , in reply to message 18.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    Ah... so he married an Anne HILL, so that definitely rules this family out then as son Donald's middle name is WARNE same as the unmarried sister staying with them in 1910.

    so close too!

    Report message19

  • Message 20

    , in reply to message 19.

    Posted by gnatalee (U1758936) on Sunday, 30th October 2011

    Yes - so close, you were definitely on a roll there !! smiley - smiley

    Thanks so much for your efforts - will have to have a re-think I think.

    Gnats

    Report message20

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.