Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Family TreesΒ  permalink

missing in 1861

• Message 1.Β 

  Posted by jc (U1902680) on Tuesday, 4th October 2011

  I need another pair of eyes please for the following Smith family:
  
  1851 census HO107/2435 folio 414 ed 5 page 23
  Cockermouth Workington Cumberland
  Threapland St Bothel and Threapland
  Isaac Smith age 34 Hesket in the Forest Cumberland
  Catherine Smith wife age 23 Allasborne Cumberland
  Hannah Smith age 10
  Margaret Smith age 8
  Thomas Smith age 5
  Robert Smith age 2 born Bothel & Threapland
  
  1861 census
  
  1871 census RG10/4999 ED 10 Folio 65 Page 14 household 72 Bishopwearmouth
  Back Harrison St Bishopwearmouth
  Isaac Smith head mar 52 labourer in foundry Cumberland
  Catherine Smith wife mar 44 Cumberland
  Robert Smith son mar 23 glass man Cumberland
  Jane Smith dau-law mar 24 Monkwearmouth
  Isaac Smith son unm 16 Floyeman Durham Bishopwearmouth
  Mary E Smith dau unm 18 Cumberland
  Joseph Smith son unm 14 labourer in bottle works Durham Bishopwearmouth
  Elizabeth Ann Smith dau 11 Bishopwearmouth
  William Smith son 8 Bishopwearmouth
  Catherine Smith dau 3 Bishopwearmouth
  Margaret E Smith dau 1 Bishopwearmouth
  
  I've also not found a marriage for Isaac Smith and Catherine Henderson Little 1841 Isaac is with a wife called Mary but by 1851 he appears settled with Catherine. Mary's last child baptised was Robert in 1848, after that all the children belong to Catherine.
  
  thanks in advance

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message1

• Message 2

  , in reply to message 1.

  Posted by BoothHunter (U14812392) on Wednesday, 5th October 2011

  
  
  Catherine Little marriages on the free one...you will have to get someone with subs to look further for you...
  
  and deaths on the free one:
  
  
  Might help...
  
  Not really sure what you are looking for sorry can't help more at this point...
  
  BH
  
  
  

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message2

• Message 3

  , in reply to message 1.

  Posted by Tourmie (U13798934) on Wednesday, 5th October 2011

  I think jc is looking for the family who are missing in 1861.
  
  How do you know second wife is called Henderson Little if no marriage has been found?

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message3

• Message 4

  , in reply to message 3.

  Posted by BoothHunter (U14812392) on Wednesday, 5th October 2011

  Yes I think you're right...I don't know if the wife info is right either - but there are a few marriages Catherine Little on the FREE one ...
  
  BH

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message4

• Message 5

  , in reply to message 1.

  Posted by Jowin1 (U1940449) on Wednesday, 5th October 2011

  1861 from FMP
  
  SMITH, Isaac Head Married M 31 1830 Blacksmith
  SMITH, Elizabeth Wife Married F 29 1832
  Pallion Durham
  SMITH, William Son Unmarried M 10 1851 Scholar
  Black Hill Durham
  SMITH, Robert Son Unmarried M 8 1853 Scholar
  Black Hill Durham
  SMITH, Hannah Daughter Unmarried F 6 1855 Scholar
  Black Hill Durham
  SMITH, Isaac Son Unmarried M 1 1860
  Bishopwearmouth Durham
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Piece:
  3768 Folio:
  7 Page:
  7 Registration District:
  Sunderland
  
  Civil Parish:
  Bishopwearmouth Municipal Borough:
  Sunderland Address:
  West Trimdon Street, Bishopwearmouth, Sunderland County:
  Durham
  
  The ages are out for the parents but all the children match.
  
  Jo
  
  

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message5

• Message 6

  , in reply to message 5.

  Posted by jc (U1902680) on Wednesday, 5th October 2011

  Sorry for the delay....having some computer problems
  
  I have the a birth cert for their son Isaac Smith which states his mother was Catherine Henderson Little
  
  I didn't see a marriage for a Catherine Little and Isaac Smith on the same page or an Isaac Smith marrying any Catherine in that time frame and area...I'll go and take another look at the indexes
  

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message6

• Message 7

  , in reply to message 6.

  Posted by jc (U1902680) on Wednesday, 5th October 2011

  Thanks for looking Jo but I don't think that is the right family
  
  Going back from 1871, the children should be as follows in 1861 if they were all still at home
  Thomas 15
  Robert 13
  Isaac 6
  Mary 8
  Joseph 4
  Elizabeth E 1
  
  I'll have another go later when I can can get my tree back on the computer
  

  Link to this forum: missing in 1861

  Report message7

Back to top