Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Family TreesΜύ permalink

1861 census

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 6 of 6
  • Message 1.Μύ

    Posted by docjoyce (U2115297) on Tuesday, 18th October 2005

    Is there anyone that is able to post the details of the 1861 census from the following census reference number for me please:

    RG9 68 folio 30
    London
    William Cox

    Thank you
    Joyce

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by anisel (U1752839) on Tuesday, 18th October 2005

    William Bushill abt 1835 Birmingham, Warwickshire, England Lodger St Marylebone Middlesex
    Annie Caulcker abt 1860 Marylebone, Middlesex, England Daughter St Marylebone Middlesex
    Fanny Caulcker abt 1860 Marylebone, Middlesex, England Daughter St Marylebone Middlesex
    James Caulcker abt 1833 Haverfordwest, Glamorgan, Wales Lodger St Marylebone Middlesex
    Sophia Caulcker abt 1837 Marylebone, Middlesex, England Wife St Marylebone Middlesex
    William Cox abt 1834 Birmingham, Warwickshire, England Lodger St Marylebone Middlesex
    George Fontain abt 1841 Not Known, Middlesex, England Lodger St Marylebone Middlesex
    Thomas Perkins abt 1837 Birmingham, Warwickshire, England Mar St Marylebone Middlesex
    Charles John Smith abt 1823 Hindolveston, Norfolk, England Head St Marylebone Middlesex
    Charles John Smith abt 1861 St Marylebone, Middlesex, England Son St Marylebone Middlesex
    Eliza Ann Smith abt 1859 St Marylebone, Middlesex, England Daughter St Marylebone Middlesex
    Julia Ann Smith abt 1832 Honorton, Devon, England Wife St Marylebone Middlesex

    Source information: RG9/68
    Registration district: Marylebone
    Sub-registration district: All Souls
    ED, institution, or vessel: 9
    Folio: 30
    Page: 56
    Household schedule number: 380
    GSU Number: 542567

    All at 9 Ridinghouse St (? might be Lane). William's occupation seems to be Silver Plate; Perkins and Bushill who are also from Birmingham are electroplate workers. The other men are tailors. William is married.

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Ros (U1905634) on Tuesday, 18th October 2005

    William Cox appears to be a Lodger, born abt 1834 in Birmingham, Warks.

    Living in ?Ridinghouse St? in Parish of St Marylebone.

    Occupation - Silver Plate.

    Hope this helps. Is there anyone that is able to post the details of the 1861 census from the following census reference number for me please:

    RG9 68 folio 30
    London
    William Cox

    Thank you
    Joyce
    Μύ

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by docjoyce (U2115297) on Tuesday, 18th October 2005

    aninsel and ros

    Many many thanks for the reply and hard work.

    I was hoping that William Cox was unmarried, the bithyear could do with being a bit later by a about 4/5 years, but I know that sometimes this information was a little out sometimes.

    If not too much trouble would you be able just to confirm that William was married, if he was he was obviously away from his wife when the census was taken.

    Thanks once again.
    Joyce

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by anisel (U1752839) on Tuesday, 18th October 2005

    William is definitely married. I had to look closely because the writing is a little 'extravagant'and there are a lot of later markings, but the four lodgers are listed together. Perkins is 'Mar', Cox and Bushill below him are 'do' and Fontain 'Unm' which looks very different. The age, 27, is unmistakeable due to the form of the 7 which takes up 2 lines.

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by docjoyce (U2115297) on Tuesday, 18th October 2005

    Hi anisel

    Thanks for getting back, that's a shame I was hoping that person wasn't going to be married on the 1871 census. I suppose I'll have to see if that marriage ended. The ancestor I am looking for was married in 1877 and stated as a bachelor on his marriage certificate.

    Thanks again
    Joyce

    Report message6

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Μύto take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.