Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Family TreesΜύ permalink

Help- A Mystery

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 11 of 11
  • Message 1.Μύ

    Posted by MrGrinch-Champion of the Middle Saxons (U1934518) on Saturday, 15th October 2005

    Hi All,
    Ive been pondering on a family mystery for some time and was wondering if any of you guys had any ideas.
    Francis Folly was born in Hounslow in 1863 and lived all of his life there apart from his time of death. He died 18th January 1878 at St Mary's Hospital in London aged 14. This is the first mystery. Its not common in those days for patients to be admitted to hospital, especially one so far away. Why did Francis end up here? I thought he could be visiting family, but have found no link to the area.
    The second mystery. He was buried back in Hounslow, but not until the autumn, a full 9 months after he died. Why was this ? As far as the death cert says, he died of natural causes, so no police involvment.
    Can any one help? Another mystery probably unconnected, Francis had a brother also called Francis. He was born in 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon, and prsume he died and Francis II was named after him, BUT i cant find a death cert for him? Can anybody enlighten me ?

    Regards
    JF

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Stepney Boy (U1760040) on Saturday, 15th October 2005

    Hi Gumpy,
    The whole family is on the 1871 census. RG10/1312 Folio 133 Page 8 refers.
    Your francis born 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon is in fact a Frederick on the census returns which may explain your 3rd question.

    Where abouts in London is the St. Mary's hospital you mention?

    Regards
    Spike Hi All,
    Ive been pondering on a family mystery for some time and was wondering if any of you guys had any ideas.
    Francis Folly was born in Hounslow in 1863 and lived all of his life there apart from his time of death. He died 18th January 1878 at St Mary's Hospital in London aged 14. This is the first mystery. Its not common in those days for patients to be admitted to hospital, especially one so far away. Why did Francis end up here? I thought he could be visiting family, but have found no link to the area.
    The second mystery. He was buried back in Hounslow, but not until the autumn, a full 9 months after he died. Why was this ? As far as the death cert says, he died of natural causes, so no police involvment.
    Can any one help? Another mystery probably unconnected, Francis had a brother also called Francis. He was born in 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon, and prsume he died and Francis II was named after him, BUT i cant find a death cert for him? Can anybody enlighten me ?

    Regards
    JF Μύ

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by MrGrinch-Champion of the Middle Saxons (U1934518) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Thanks Spike,
    Frederick and Francis are not the same person. Frederick was born in 1852 at Stokenchurch and Francis was born in 1854 at the same place. They then moved to High Wycombe, then from there to Hounslow, Middx. The family do not appear on the 1861 census, so Francis Jnr must have died in between 1854 and 1863.
    St Mary's is in the centre of London around 12 miles from Hounslow.
    Hope you can help !
    Regards
    James Hi Gumpy,
    The whole family is on the 1871 census. RG10/1312 Folio 133 Page 8 refers.
    Your francis born 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon is in fact a Frederick on the census returns which may explain your 3rd question.

    Where abouts in London is the St. Mary's hospital you mention?

    Regards
    Spike Hi All,
    Ive been pondering on a family mystery for some time and was wondering if any of you guys had any ideas.
    Francis Folly was born in Hounslow in 1863 and lived all of his life there apart from his time of death. He died 18th January 1878 at St Mary's Hospital in London aged 14. This is the first mystery. Its not common in those days for patients to be admitted to hospital, especially one so far away. Why did Francis end up here? I thought he could be visiting family, but have found no link to the area.
    The second mystery. He was buried back in Hounslow, but not until the autumn, a full 9 months after he died. Why was this ? As far as the death cert says, he died of natural causes, so no police involvment.
    Can any one help? Another mystery probably unconnected, Francis had a brother also called Francis. He was born in 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon, and prsume he died and Francis II was named after him, BUT i cant find a death cert for him? Can anybody enlighten me ?

    Regards
    JF Μύ
    Μύ

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Stepney Boy (U1760040) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Hi Grumpy,
    I am at work at the moment but if you do not have access to the 1871 census I will put up on the board the whole family as it appears on the census.
    Please advise if this would be helpful to you. Francis may have been injured / killed in the area of St.Mary's and taken there as the nearest hospital also his death may not have been registered straight away. Just a thought. Thanks Spike,
    Frederick and Francis are not the same person. Frederick was born in 1852 at Stokenchurch and Francis was born in 1854 at the same place. They then moved to High Wycombe, then from there to Hounslow, Middx. The family do not appear on the 1861 census, so Francis Jnr must have died in between 1854 and 1863.
    St Mary's is in the centre of London around 12 miles from Hounslow.
    Hope you can help !
    Regards
    James Hi Gumpy,
    The whole family is on the 1871 census. RG10/1312 Folio 133 Page 8 refers.
    Your francis born 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon is in fact a Frederick on the census returns which may explain your 3rd question.

    Where abouts in London is the St. Mary's hospital you mention?

    Regards
    Spike Hi All,
    Ive been pondering on a family mystery for some time and was wondering if any of you guys had any ideas.
    Francis Folly was born in Hounslow in 1863 and lived all of his life there apart from his time of death. He died 18th January 1878 at St Mary's Hospital in London aged 14. This is the first mystery. Its not common in those days for patients to be admitted to hospital, especially one so far away. Why did Francis end up here? I thought he could be visiting family, but have found no link to the area.
    The second mystery. He was buried back in Hounslow, but not until the autumn, a full 9 months after he died. Why was this ? As far as the death cert says, he died of natural causes, so no police involvment.
    Can any one help? Another mystery probably unconnected, Francis had a brother also called Francis. He was born in 1854 in Stokenchurch, Oxon, and prsume he died and Francis II was named after him, BUT i cant find a death cert for him? Can anybody enlighten me ?

    Regards
    JF Μύ
    Μύ
    Μύ

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Stepney Boy (U1760040) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Hi Grumpy,
    I am at work at the moment but if you do not have access to the 1871 census I will put up on the board the whole family as it appears on the census.
    Please advise if this would be helpful to you. Francis may have been injured / killed in the area of St.Mary's and taken there as the nearest hospital also his death may not have been registered straight away. Just a thought.

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by jc (U1902680) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    As Francis was only 14, perhaps he suffered from some kind of illness all his life which was being treated at St Mary's Hospital and did infact die of "natural causes" when the illness got worse ie a heart condition since birth - in those days he may have just been diagnosed as a "sickly" child.
    I've just looked at National Archives/Wellcome Trust site and St Marys patient archives don't start till 1880 and admissions/discharges from 1900.... both a bit too late to help. Even in the early days, St Marys was a teaching hosptial and alot of research was done there so this may have been the reason why Francis was there. Perhaps they were giving "free" treatment to people suffering from certain conditions so they could try the latest medicines or procedures.

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by reader (U1767310) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Hi Grumpy
    I do like a mystery so her is my theory.
    Francis was working in London when he became ill and was taken to the nearest hospital.
    If the Hospital was a teaching hospital perhaps his family agreed to help medical science and later the hospital paid for his burial.

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 6.

    Posted by MrGrinch-Champion of the Middle Saxons (U1934518) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Thanks for that, its a very plausable theory. He died of plythesis which i believe is fluid on the lungs. The free treatmeant theory might be true?

    Regards As Francis was only 14, perhaps he suffered from some kind of illness all his life which was being treated at St Mary's Hospital and did infact die of "natural causes" when the illness got worse ie a heart condition since birth - in those days he may have just been diagnosed as a "sickly" child.
    I've just looked at National Archives/Wellcome Trust site and St Marys patient archives don't start till 1880 and admissions/discharges from 1900.... both a bit too late to help. Even in the early days, St Marys was a teaching hosptial and alot of research was done there so this may have been the reason why Francis was there. Perhaps they were giving "free" treatment to people suffering from certain conditions so they could try the latest medicines or procedures. Μύ

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by MrGrinch-Champion of the Middle Saxons (U1934518) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Thsnks for your theory,
    Sounds plausable. He was 14 when he died, so might be a bit young to work up in London. He probably would have been an apprentice bricklayer which was the family trade. Would you let your 14 child aid medical science ? He was buried in a paupers grave so the hospital wouldnt have paid much for the funeral !
    What do you think?

    Regards Hi Grumpy
    I do like a mystery so her is my theory.
    Francis was working in London when he became ill and was taken to the nearest hospital.
    If the Hospital was a teaching hospital perhaps his family agreed to help medical science and later the hospital paid for his burial.Μύ

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by MrGrinch-Champion of the Middle Saxons (U1934518) on Sunday, 16th October 2005

    Hi Spike,
    I have the transcription from that census, thanks for the thought. Francis died of plythesis which i think is fluid on the lungs. Still a mystery i think ?

    Regards
    Hi Grumpy,
    I am at work at the moment but if you do not have access to the 1871 census I will put up on the board the whole family as it appears on the census.
    Please advise if this would be helpful to you. Francis may have been injured / killed in the area of St.Mary's and taken there as the nearest hospital also his death may not have been registered straight away. Just a thought.Μύ

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 9.

    Posted by reader (U1767310) on Monday, 17th October 2005

    <quote user='GrumpyAussiehater' userid='1934518'>Thsnks for your theory,
    Sounds plausable. He was 14 when he died, so might be a bit young to work up in London. He probably would have been an apprentice bricklayer which was the family trade. Would you let your 14 child aid medical science ? He was buried in a paupers grave so the hospital wouldnt have paid much for the funeral !
    What do you think?

    Hi Grumpy
    Too young at 14 to be working in London? Yes, but different days. My Mum left home and started work at 14 and my Dad travelled 200 miles to work in London when 15; that was the 1930's.
    Agree a paupers grave meant unlikely he aided medical science (my daughter is reading about Burke and Hare in school - that's why it came to mind) but that gap between death and burial is curious. I think plythesis could be another name for TB.

    Report message11

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Μύto take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.