This discussion has been closed.
Posted by docjoyce (U2115297) on Thursday, 29th September 2005
Still searching for a William Henry Cox
born in Birmingham on the 1851 census for
Warwickshire. He would have been aged
between 4 and 7 and stated on the census
as a visitor, relative or even stepson.
I have his parents and siblings on the
1861, 1871 and 1851 censuses, but he does
not show up on the 1851 with them.
Any help with this one, will be so greatly
received and appreciated.
Joyce
Have you tried ringing Birmingham Archives. The 1851 census is name indexed they may help you.
You can also ask via e mail. Just Google Birmingham Records for contact info
Thanks busybeaver
I will give them a try, this little man
has to be somewhere.
Hi Docjoyce,<BR /><BR />Sad to say there is the other possibilty that he died young. There is a death registered in the June 1/4 of 1851 in Birmingham of a William Henry COX but no age given.<BR />Regards<BR />Spike<QUOTE' USER='DocJoyce' USERID='2115297'>Still searching for a William Henry Cox <BR />born in Birmingham on the 1851 census for<BR />Warwickshire. He would have been aged<BR />between 4 and 7 and stated on the census<BR />as a visitor, relative or even stepson. <BR />I have his parents and siblings on the <BR />1861, 1871 and 1851 censuses, but he does<BR />not show up on the 1851 with them.<BR /><BR />Any help with this one, will be so greatly<BR />received and appreciated.<BR /><BR />Joyce<BR /></QUOTE>
Hi Spike
Thanks for the reply and showing interest again
in my 'lost' William Henry Cox, very much
appreciated.
Don't forget I do have him on the 1861,1871, 1881 and 1891 censuses, but not that vital 1851.
Joyce
Hi DocJoyce,<BR /> Got my wires crossed Will bear him in mind.<BR />Regards<BR />Spike<QUOTE' USER='DocJoyce' USERID='2115297'>Hi Spike<BR /><BR />Thanks for the reply and showing interest again<BR />in my 'lost' William Henry Cox, very much<BR />appreciated.<BR /><BR />Don't forget I do have him on the 1861,1871, 1881 and 1891 censuses, but not that vital 1851. <BR /><BR />Joyce<BR /> </QUOTE>
Hi DocJoyce,<BR /> Got my wires crossed<SMILEY TYPE='doh' H2G2='Smiley#doh'/> Will bear him in mind.<BR />Regards<BR />Spike<QUOTE' USER='DocJoyce' USERID='2115297'>Hi Spike<BR /><BR />Thanks for the reply and showing interest again<BR />in my 'lost' William Henry Cox, very much<BR />appreciated.<BR /><BR />Don't forget I do have him on the 1861,1871, 1881 and 1891 censuses, but not that vital 1851. <BR /><BR />Joyce<BR /> </QUOTE>
Please ignore this information about finding
William Henry Cox on the 1861 and 1871 censuses,
as I have just found the very same family on the
1881 census. This means that it was the wrong
William Henry Cox all along, and I am no longer searching for that one on the 1851 census. I already have the
real William Henry Cox living with his wife and
family in Plymouth on the 1881 census. Still need to find him now on the 1871 though and if possible the 1861. I will post my details about him at a later time.
Joyce
The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.
or Β to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
The message board is closed for posting.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.