Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

History HubΒ  permalink

Foundlings

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 4 of 4
  • Message 1.Β 

    Posted by christine howling (U14293360) on Wednesday, 22nd June 2011

    I have been trying to find the birth of James Frederick Stannett
    who was according to his death certificate born 1st January 1892 in Clapham, London and died in Leicester in September 1978. He was married in Leicestershire in 1920 but I cannot find him on the 1901 or 1911 census so if anyone can help with his whereabouts in those early years. I have been told that he was a foundling, so maybe his date of birth and names were not registered. I understood be lived somewhere until he was 7 years old but have no information where this was. I had an idea it was in the London area but that is only hearsay. If he was in an institution how can I locate him. If he was a foundling how would he have been named or would he have been an orphan.

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by somewhatsilly (U14315357) on Wednesday, 22nd June 2011

    Hi Christine,
    You're more likely to get help if you post your question on the Family Tree board, the link is on the left of the screen.

    good hunting.

    ferval

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by Caro (U1691443) on Thursday, 23rd June 2011

    Christine,

    I visited the Foundling Museum when I was in London - people were taken there with the blessing of their parents/mothers. There was something of a waiting list at one stage, and children taken there were wet-nursed in the community before coming into the Foundling Hospital permanently. This one began in the 18th century and I can't remember now just whether it was still operating on those founding principles by the 20th century or not. Oh, yes I see it was.

    But I remember being rather distressed, at least partly because of the thought of genealogical researchers, at hearing that the children were given new identities when they entered the home. Though parents could still come and collect them later so there was some form of linking the new ID with the old. But I don't think it is particularly easy to check on an individual.

    In that particular (early) one he would not have been an orphan to go there in the early days, but I am not sure about later.

    I suppose there's a chance your man's parents left the country and returned later, but it is unlikely.

    Cheers, Caro.

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by christine howling (U14293360) on Friday, 24th June 2011

    Thank you very much for the information.
    Kind regards
    Christine

    Report message4

Back to top

About this Board

The History message boards are now closed. They remain visible as a matter of record but the opportunity to add new comments or open new threads is no longer available. Thank you all for your valued contributions over many years.

or Β to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

The message board is closed for posting.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.