Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ BLOGS - Viewfinder

Archives for January 2010

On a different wavelength: 100 years of infrared photography

Phil Coomes | 09:30 UK time, Friday, 29 January 2010

Comments

Infrared photographs by Professor Robert Williams Wood in the Illustrated London News, 1911

This year sees the 100th anniversary of the first published infrared photograph. Though there had been infrared spectrograms produced before 1910, as far as we know the first infrared images in print were taken by Professor Robert Williams Wood and published in the October 1910 Photographic Journal of the (RPS).

Wood's pictures later appeared in the in June 1911, as shown at the top of this page.

Infrared radiation was discovered in 1800 and today has a multitude of applications including the laser in your CD player and those remote controls for your TV that always vanish down the back of the sofa. Infrared imaging is widely used, though primarily in other fields away from artistic photography such as forensics, medical and scientific imaging and astronomy.

Infrared photography shows us a world we can recognise, and yet it has an alien quality to it, something like Mars in early science fiction films. Flash Gordon would be well at home.

An infrared photograph of Bob Dylan by Elliott Landy in 1968

Infrared is part of the spectrum beyond that which the eye can see, yet photographic devices are capable of recording it. But this is not a how-to guide; if you are interested in one, is a good place to start.

One reason, I have to confess, is my near-ignorance of all things infrared. It's not something I can claim to have shot - at least not successfully!

Infrared photograph by Andy Finney

So I asked Andy Finney, an expert in this field, to explain a little of the history and what draws him to this alien world. He said:

"Why does infrared photography fascinate me? Partly it is because I like the way it emphasises inanimate objects in the landscape, crosses in graveyards overgrown with foliage for example. I love the way trees can look like rivers of fire dancing around obsidian branches and boughs.

"Another reason is that no-one can say that it shouldn't look like that - any flavour is equally valid.

"Near-infrared behaves like visible light, whereas the longer-wavelength thermal infrared plays tricks, and will go through a bin liner but not glass, and can make a ball of hot air seem to be a solid object.

"Near-infrared can be imaged using appropriately sensitised film and conventional digital imaging chips, whereas thermal imaging requires more specialised equipment, so it's the near infrared spectrum we are interested in as photographers.

"The colour which a visible object appears is a result of the amount of red, green and blue light that it reflects. The same is true with near-infrared, and with a few exceptions, the big one being foliage, most things have the same tone in infrared as they do in a normal mono photo.

"The scattered light we see in the sky is made up of shorter wavelengths, which makes it look blue. The light is scattered by tiny particles in the air, which only affects shorter wavelengths. You can make the sky darker in a black and white photo by using a red filter. With infrared, the sky goes darker still. The clouds, however, are reflecting all the light and are as bright in infrared as they are in visible light. Since shadows are lit by open sky, and the open sky is dark in infrared, shadows are darker too.

"Open water, such as a river or lake, reflects the sky, and so the water will also look dark. This is nothing to do with water absorbing infrared.

"As film-based photographers knew back at the end of the 19th Century, it was actually difficult to get film to record red light and so it took some serious effort to sensitise to infrared. When Professor Wood gave his RPS lecture in 1910, he had sensitised his own plates, since infrared film did not become commercially available until the 1930s.

"Once available, though, it seems to have been popular in the mid-to-late-30s; even is reported to have shot a few infrared photographs - but he was, sadly, not enthusiastic. Logie Baird even designed and built an infrared TV system called the . Hollywood used infrared film for special effects, such as shooting night scenes during daylight.

"At that time, there were a number of films available from various companies including Kodak, Ilford and Agfa, and there are still infrared films available today.

"But it wasn't until the arrival of digital photography that infrared enthusiasm really took off since it is relatively easy to take infrared shots with a digital camera - that is if you can overcome the infrared filtering built into your camera.

"When I started my infrared photography website in the mid-1990s, there were very few of us about and the film was difficult to buy and fiddly to use. In recent years, it has spread and the web is brimming with fantastic infrared views of the world.

"Since the 1930s a number of notable photographers have dabbled and even specialised in infrared photography. , for example, saw infrared as an extension of his exploration of tone in photographs.

"The legendary took iconic photos of cinema audiences using infrared and took some great colour infrared photos of Ornette Coleman, Bob Dylan (see above) and The Band in the late '60s. More recently, has produced a series of books on ruined and haunted buildings and used infrared film to shoot the cover of U2's album The Unforgettable Fire. Infrared cameras have also shown us the goings-on in the Big Brother bedrooms and in the darkness of night on the African plains."

So there you have it, an alien world ready to be captured on your doorstep.

The RPS is planning an exhibition of infrared photography in Bath and a two-day symposium in London in October 2010.

The website , which Andy runs, is encouraging enthusiasts to get together and show their work.

I'd also love to see your infrared pictures. Please send them to viewfinder@bbc.co.uk and I'll publish a selection in the coming weeks.

You can see some of Andy's infrared pictures on his and on .

Infrared photograph of a space shuttle launch

Your pictures of the week: Comfort

Phil Coomes | 10:20 UK time, Thursday, 28 January 2010

Comments

This week, we asked you to send us your pictures on the theme of comfort.

We had more than 400 entries so it was a tough task to edit it down to 12 pictures for this week's gallery. You .

Many thanks to those who submitted work and my congratulations to those whose photos were selected.

I hope you enjoy looking at the pictures and if you have any comments to make, you can do so below.

If your picture didn't make this week's selection, why not send us something for next week?

The new theme is "Four legs". Interpret this in any way you see fit and send your pictures to us at yourpics@bbc.co.uk or .

Please include the word "Four legs" in the subject line of your message.

The deadline is midnight GMT Tuesday 2 February 2010, and remember to add your name and a caption: who, what, where and when should be enough, though the more details you give, the better your chance of being selected.

We will publish a selection of your photos this time next week.

.

Files should be sent as JPEGs. They shouldn't be larger than 10Mb and ideally much smaller: around 1Mb is fine, or you can resize your pictures to 1,000 pixels across.

Please see our terms and conditions, but remember that the copyright remains with you. The pictures will only be used by the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ for the purposes of this project. Finally, when taking photos, please do not endanger yourself or others, take unnecessary risks or infringe any laws.

Your pictures of the week: Craft

Phil Coomes | 10:13 UK time, Thursday, 21 January 2010

Comments

This week, we asked you to send us your pictures on the theme of craft.

We have an interesting range of pictures for you to enjoy and you .

Many thanks to those who submitted work and my congratulations to those whose photos were selected.

I hope you enjoy looking at the pictures and if you have any comments to make, you can do so below.

If your picture didn't make this week's selection, why not send us something for next week?

The new theme is "Comfort". Interpret this in any way you see fit and send your pictures to us at yourpics@bbc.co.uk or .

Please include the word "Comfort" in the subject line of your message.

The deadline is midnight GMT Tuesday 26 January 2010, and remember to add your name and a caption: who, what, where and when should be enough, though the more details you give, the better your chance of being selected.

We will publish a selection of your photos this time next week.

.

Files should be sent as JPEGs. They shouldn't be larger than 10Mb and ideally much smaller: around 1Mb is fine, or you can resize your pictures to 1,000 pixels across.

Please see our terms and conditions, but remember that the copyright remains with you. The pictures will only be used by the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ for the purposes of this project. Finally, when taking photos, please do not endanger yourself or others, take unnecessary risks or infringe any laws.

Daily Life Revisited

Phil Coomes | 13:48 UK time, Wednesday, 20 January 2010

Comments

Photo by Richard Schofield

Towards the end of last year I looked back at the early days of picture messaging and the birth of citizen journalism at the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ including our first attempts to ask for, and use, readers' pictures. At that time in 2003 we wondered if the cameras on our mobile phones would replace conventional cameras. Well now it seems we have come to that point.

Richard Schofield has just been awarded a distinction in his master's degree in photojournalism and documentary photography at the London College of Communication. Nothing odd about that, but what makes it different is that the pictures were all shot on a simple mobile phone.

.

Richard's project was called Daily Life Revisited and was shot in Lithuania where he has been based since 2001. The title of the series stems from the work by , Lithuania's most celebrated photographer, whose work is often compared to or .

Richard found that Sutkus' work gave him a way of ordering his own pictures, a framework in which to bring together the project.

Photo by Richard SchofieldHe said: "The main connection is that we're both interested in celebrating the ordinary lives of ordinary people. The title of my project incidentally, Daily Life Revisited, was respectfully commandeered from Sutkus' extraordinary Daily Life Archives (KasdienybΔ—s Archyvai) project."

Richard's pictures show his ability to get physically close to the subject and this is undoubtedly aided by the use of a mobile phone. Some of the pictures are close-up shots, where the person depicted is unaware the photo is being taken; in others you can see the reaction of the subject.

Richard said:

"There are two clichΓ©s I like. Firstly, it's often been said that the dream of every photographer is to be invisible. I've discovered that the dual functionality of a mobile phone can create enlighteningly discrete photographs of life on the streets thanks to its propensity to render photographers almost entirely invisible.
Μύ
"With a mobile phone I can photograph people without their knowledge, which, if you ignore the large can of worms it opens, can create some startlingly candid pictures hitherto impossible to create with more cumbersome and obvious equipment.
Μύ
"Secondly, it's the photographer that takes the photograph, not the camera. This sends out a positive message to people who can't afford the luxury of an expensive camera but who'd like to take good photographs. I know a lot of people who've spent frightening amounts of cash on a fancy camera only to discover they still don't take very good photographs.
Μύ
"The mobile phone is simply another tool that if used wisely can be used to create great photographs."

Indeed that's true. I'm sure many of us have shot pictures on a mobile phone and the reaction you get is very different to that you'd receive if you pulled out a large SLR, but as Richard says, it's another tool, another technique. Whilst it's the person behind the camera that makes the picture, the type of kit you use will affect the type of pictures you take.

Using a mobile phone might make it easier to shoot discreetly, but I'd say as long as the final result is a faithful representation then it's not a problem, or at least the issues are the same regardless of what kit you are using. Much of it comes down to how the pictures are used, not so much that you've taken them.

There are many different ways to work on the street as a photographer and I asked Richard to talk about his views on this, he told me:

"There's a particular style of street photography prevalent among photographers working in the medium which I believe is more about the actual finished photograph and the person taking the photograph rather than the subject itself.
Μύ
"Personally, and a lot of people disagree with me, this goes against everything I believe good street photography should be.
Μύ
"An awful lot of street photography celebrates the playfulness of people as they unwittingly interact with their environment, which is undeniably clever and that often produces great photographs, but for me this type of photography says more about art than it does about life. It's certainly not particularly accessible to the average person, who I'm trying to reach with my own pictures."
Μύ
"I've been using the two-megapixel camera phone for over two years and have pretty much exhausted its possibilities, but I've only just started experimenting with the potential of using mobile phones as serious tools for creating professional documentary photography. I recently bought the eight-megapixel Nokia N86, which not only produces infinitely better quality images than my old phone but that's also a lot more sophisticated.
Μύ
"I'm still getting to know what it can and can't do, but have plenty of ideas for future projects. I used to make documentary films and worked a lot in Cuba in the 90s and am currently researching a project there that I started as a film but never completed."

You can follow Richards work on , or view his photos on .

The price of a picture

Phil Coomes | 14:56 UK time, Monday, 18 January 2010

Comments

Photo by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on display at a charity auction in St Petersburg, Russia

What makes a photograph valuable? The photograph above shows the white stone walls and towers of the Kremlin in Tobolsk, a town that is known as one of the final homes of Russia's last tsar and his family during the time of the 1917 Russian Revolution. It's a nice enough picture, but is it worth more than one million pounds?

That's the price Mikhail Zingarevich, a board member at Ilim Group, paid for it at a charity auction in St Petersburg. The proceeds will go to buy furniture for World War II veterans receiving long-promised apartments, equipment for a children's hospital and a new kitchen for an alcohol rehabilitation centre.

But why is this picture worth so much? Well, because it was taken by the Russian president Dmitry Medvedev who is a keen photographer.

Dmitry Medvedev. Photo by Dmitry Astakhov, Presidential Press Service, RIA Novosti.The name of the artist is always going to be what drives the price of the object, especially where photography is concerned as it is endlessly reproducible. But why spend thousands when a postcard or relatively cheap reproduction will look just as good on the wall of your home or office?

It's about ownership of the object as these pictures have ceased to be photographs; they are now consumer items, no different from a piece of furniture or a car, or even a collectable camera. The content is to some extent irrelevant, it's the connections potential buyers make to the object and its history. Owning the print does not bring any rights to use the picture, just ownership of the object.

Recent sales at Swann Auction Galleries in New York saw a rare vintage print of Ansel Adams's iconic image of Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico, from 1948 sell for Β£220,000 and the well-known news picture by Eddie Adams of General Nguyen Ngoc Loan executing a Viet Cong prisoner Nguyen Van Lem in Saigon during the Vietnam War sold for just over Β£26,000.

Apart from great pictures, though from very different genres, these are historical documents with inscriptions on their reverse, a provenance and a connection to the photographer and in light of the price paid for the recent picture of Tobolsk would seem to be good value.

In an age of digital reproduction it's hard to see how pictures created today will gain this sort of value. I wonder how much Medvedev's picture will be worth in 50 years' time?

Remembering the work of Dennis Stock

Phil Coomes | 11:30 UK time, Friday, 15 January 2010

Comments

Dennis Stock

Earlier this week the photo agency Magnum announced that photographer Dennis Stock had died aged 81. Dennis joined the Magnum Photos in 1951 following an apprenticeship with Life photographer Gjon Mili.

Dennis was a photographer who worked on long term projects, he lived his subject.
He's been quoted as saying:

"I'm not a photojournalist, and never wanted to be one. I am a photo essayist. I will never follow the news of the day, but search out my own stories based on what enlightens me, what helps me grow, what gives me spiritual insight - in short, what I love."

In the mid-1950s this belief took Dennis to Los Angeles where he specialised in covering Hollywood. In the book on the agency by Russell Miller, Dennis is quoted as saying "I would spend weekends with Humphrey Bogart, getting drunk with him on his boat. He liked me because I could give as good as I got."

James Dean by Dennis StockAt that time Dennis also attended parties held by director Nicholas Ray and it was here he met James Dean which led to his shooting a photo essay on the young actor, including the picture he's best known for which shows Dean with his shoulders hunched as he strolls through Time Square.

Despite the success of that picture Dennis should be remembered for far more. His early work was inspired by photographer Eugene Smith but later he took inspiration from fellow Magnum member Ernst Haas as he began to explore the world of colour photography and brought to it his own style and vision.

Dennis Stock was a true example of the committed photographer so I'll end with a quote taken from the book Magnum Stories in which he said:

"I think that if you want to take really good pictures, you do it by not working for a client. You can't be looking over your shoulder, concerned about fitting the formula of whoever has hired you. Your concern is to go out there and discover, to the best of your ability, and hat's the fundamental drive of all this."

.

Your pictures of the week: Metal

Phil Coomes | 12:23 UK time, Thursday, 14 January 2010

Comments

This week we asked you to send us your pictures on the theme metal. We had a good range of pictures to choose from and you .

Many thanks to those who submitted work and my congratulations to those whose photos were selected.

I hope you enjoy looking at the pictures and if you have any comments to make you can do so below.

If your picture didn't make this week's selection, why not send us something for next week?

The new theme is "Craft". Interpret this in any way you see fit and send your pictures to us at yourpics@bbc.co.uk or .

Please include the word "Craft" in the subject line of your message.

The deadline is midnight GMT Tuesday 19 January 2010, and remember to add your name and a caption: who, what, where and when should be enough, though the more details you give, the better your chance of being selected.

We will publish a selection of your photos this time next week.

.

Files should be sent as JPEGs. They shouldn't be larger than 10Mb and ideally much smaller: around 1Mb is fine, or you can resize your pictures to 1,000 pixels across.

Please see our terms and conditions, but remember that the copyright remains with you. The pictures will only be used by the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ for the purposes of this project. Finally, when taking photos, please do not endanger yourself or others, take unnecessary risks or infringe any laws.

Latest news on my Kodachrome project

Phil Coomes | 11:45 UK time, Friday, 8 January 2010

Comments

It's been a while since I reported on my Kodachrome 64 project. Regular readers of this blog might remember that back in October I began a photo-a-day project to mark the end of Kodachrome whose demise was announced by Kodak in June 2009.

This year marks the 75th anniversary of that film and , is the only remaining laboratory processing the film, and even that line will shut down at the end of 2010.

My project is set to run for 64 weeks, the time linked to the film speed, 64 ISO.

, which you can see above. It's a typical shot in the series, found scenes, shapes and patterns, almost anything that catches my eye.

It's very much a personal project, something to ensure I continue to shoot film and to take pictures for myself, not just for work or shots of the family.

In that respect it is working. Some photographs are undoubtedly stronger than others but probably the best feature of the project is that it's helped open up a world of photography I'd drifted away from as I spend much of my time looking at news pictures.

This project has meant that I have been able to enjoy so many great pictures and personal projects by other photographers, many amateurs just doing it for the love of their hobby.

There are vast numbers of inspiring pictures out there, for me though it's also the context of the shot that helps to keep my interest, a jaw dropping picture soon loses its appeal if there is no substance.

One example of someone committed to their photography is who has also been shooting a photo-a-day project that started in 2008 and continues now.

We exchanged a few e-mails and comments on Flickr and the upshot was that for one month of his project he had the idea of limiting himself to really shooting one picture-a-day on film, so a 36 exposure film would last him the month with a few frames to spare. The results are intriguing.

The shot to the right is one example. So simple, something that if you weren't forcing yourself to look for a picture each day you'd probably never raise the camera to your eye to capture. Yet it works.

I asked him to comment on the month he spent using just one roll:

Lewis said:

"The project had good days and bad days. Sometimes I was certain I had taken something quite boring, at other times I had the feeling I might have captured something exciting and on others it was completely unknown. I'm not sure I've been so excited about developing a film for years because I had so little idea about the photos, or how they'd work as a set.

"It was always a balancing act with time, partly because there was always the temptation to shoot the first eye catching subject encountered, but also because the time of year means you have so few hours of light to work in."

You can see the shots , or you can follow his .

Given my use of Kodachrome I was interested to hear from who sent me a link to small .

The film must have been stored well as the colours are as bright as ever. It's not the only roll of Kodachrome Paul has shot; .

I asked Paul where he got his film from:

"I received expired stock in different ways, some were bought from eBay, some were bought at my local camera stores, online from camera stores across the country, and from other photographers through film swaps. The batches of stock are different; the quality of the pictures you get depends on how they were stored, and the age of the film."

Paul's work led me to a pool on Flickr that . An odd idea you might think as you could lose that great shot if the film turns out to be beyond saving, but then again at a time when we are swamped with thousands of digital pictures maybe this is a way to stand out from the crowd, .

Finally from Brooklyn sent me a . I'd imagine there are thousands of pictures shot on Kodachrome of anyone growing up in the 60s and 70s hiding away in drawers. The film's stability is well known and the pictures look as fresh today as they did when taken. If you have any, dig them out, scan them and give them the light they deserve.

.

Your pictures of the week: Celebration

Phil Coomes | 11:02 UK time, Thursday, 7 January 2010

Comments

A new year dawns and once again we asked you to send us your pictures on a theme. To mark the end of 2009, we set you the task of taking pictures that capture the idea of celebration.

.

There are some great shots including a delightful one by Linda Bamber of her dog Cassie and a somewhat rich-looking cake captured by Anna Lambert.

Many thanks to those who submitted work and my congratulations to those whose photos were selected.

I hope you enjoy looking at the pictures and if you have any comments to make you can do so below.

If your picture didn't make this week's selection, why not send us something for next week?

The new theme is "Metal". Interpret this in any way you see fit and send your pictures to us at yourpics@bbc.co.uk or .

Please include the word "Metal" in the subject line of your message.

The deadline is midnight GMT Tuesday 12 January 2010, and remember to add your name and a caption: who, what, where and when should be enough, though the more details you give, the better your chance of being selected.

We will publish a selection of your photos this time next week.

.

Files should be sent as JPEGs. They shouldn't be larger than 10Mb and ideally much smaller: around 1Mb is fine, or you can resize your pictures to 1,000 pixels across.

Please see our terms and conditions, but remember that the copyright remains with you. The pictures will only be used by the Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ for the purposes of this project. Finally, when taking photos, please do not endanger yourself or others, take unnecessary risks or infringe any laws.

More from this blog...

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ iD

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ navigation

Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ Β© 2014 The Βι¶ΉΤΌΕΔ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.